136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38204910)
1. Multi-institutional generalizability of a plan complexity machine learning model for predicting pre-treatment quality assurance results in radiotherapy.
Claessens M; De Kerf G; Vanreusel V; Mollaert I; Hernandez V; Saez J; Jornet N; Verellen D
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2024 Jan; 29():100525. PubMed ID: 38204910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IMRT QA using machine learning: A multi-institutional validation.
Valdes G; Chan MF; Lim SB; Scheuermann R; Deasy JO; Solberg TD
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):279-284. PubMed ID: 28815994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting MLC modeling errors using radiomics-based machine learning in patient-specific QA with an EPID for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Sakai M; Nakano H; Kawahara D; Tanabe S; Takizawa T; Narita A; Yamada T; Sakai H; Ueda M; Sasamoto R; Kaidu M; Aoyama H; Ishikawa H; Utsunomiya S
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):991-1002. PubMed ID: 33382467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting gamma passing rates for portal dosimetry-based IMRT QA using machine learning.
Lam D; Zhang X; Li H; Deshan Y; Schott B; Zhao T; Zhang W; Mutic S; Sun B
Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4666-4675. PubMed ID: 31386761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine learning-generated decision boundaries for prediction and exploration of patient-specific quality assurance failures in stereotactic radiosurgery plans.
Braun J; Quirk S; Tchistiakova E
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1955-1963. PubMed ID: 35064564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting VMAT patient-specific QA results using a support vector classifier trained on treatment plan characteristics and linac QC metrics.
Granville DA; Sutherland JG; Belec JG; La Russa DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(9):095017. PubMed ID: 30921785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A tool for patient-specific prediction of delivery discrepancies in machine parameters using trajectory log files.
Chuang KC; Giles W; Adamson J
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):978-990. PubMed ID: 33332618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Error detection model developed using a multi-task convolutional neural network in patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Kimura Y; Kadoya N; Oku Y; Kajikawa T; Tomori S; Jingu K
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):4769-4783. PubMed ID: 34101848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are simple IMRT beams more robust against MLC error? Exploring the impact of MLC errors on planar quality assurance and plan quality for different complexity beams.
Wang J; Jin X; Peng J; Xie J; Chen J; Hu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):147-157. PubMed ID: 27167272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examination of the properties of IMRT and VMAT beams and evaluation against pre-treatment quality assurance results.
Crowe SB; Kairn T; Middlebrook N; Sutherland B; Hill B; Kenny J; Langton CM; Trapp JV
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(6):2587-601. PubMed ID: 25761616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep Hybrid Learning Prediction of Patient-Specific Quality Assurance in Radiotherapy: Implementation in Clinical Routine.
Moreau N; Bonnor L; Jaudet C; Lechippey L; Falzone N; Batalla A; Bertaut C; Corroyer-Dulmont A
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36900087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The structural similarity index for IMRT quality assurance: radiomics-based error classification.
Ma C; Wang R; Zhou S; Wang M; Yue H; Zhang Y; Wu H
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 33128263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of VMAT: Prediction and Classification Accuracy.
Li J; Wang L; Zhang X; Liu L; Li J; Chan MF; Sui J; Yang R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Nov; 105(4):893-902. PubMed ID: 31377162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of beam complexity in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans.
Du W; Cho SH; Zhang X; Hoffman KE; Kudchadker RJ
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021716. PubMed ID: 24506607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-specific quality assurance prediction models based on machine learning for novel dual-layered MLC linac.
Zhu H; Zhu Q; Wang Z; Yang B; Zhang W; Qiu J
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 36342293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting deliverability of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using aperture complexity analysis.
Younge KC; Roberts D; Janes LA; Anderson C; Moran JM; Matuszak MM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):124-131. PubMed ID: 27455504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment plan complexity metrics for predicting IMRT pre-treatment quality assurance results.
Crowe SB; Kairn T; Kenny J; Knight RT; Hill B; Langton CM; Trapp JV
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Sep; 37(3):475-82. PubMed ID: 24810792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assurance for online adapted treatment plans: benchmarking and delivery monitoring simulation.
Li T; Wu Q; Yang Y; Rodrigues A; Yin FF; Jackie Wu Q
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 25563278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance: Identifying errors in radiotherapy delivery by radiomic analysis of gamma images with convolutional neural networks.
Nyflot MJ; Thammasorn P; Wootton LS; Ford EC; Chaovalitwongse WA
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):456-464. PubMed ID: 30548601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
