These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38205145)

  • 1. In Vitro Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cention N and Its Comparison with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) Restorative Material as Used in Primary Teeth.
    Pai D; Anirudhmaadhava PA; Ginjupalli K
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2024; 2024():9420336. PubMed ID: 38205145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness values of glass-ionomer cement Type IX and Cention N.
    Verma V; Mathur S; Sachdev V; Singh D
    J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(6):550-553. PubMed ID: 34083907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Vitro Comparison of Surface Roughness, Flexural, and Microtensile Strength of Various Glass-Ionomer-Based Materials and a New Alkasite Restorative Material.
    Kaptan A; Oznurhan F; Candan M
    Polymers (Basel); 2023 Jan; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 36771950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties and Fluoride-releasing Ability of a New Self-cure Filling Material.
    Balagopal S; Nekkanti S; Kaur K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 34257171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.
    Sujith R; Yadav TG; Pitalia D; Babaji P; Apoorva K; Sharma A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jun; 21(6):691-695. PubMed ID: 33025941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An
    Mulgaonkar A; de Ataide IN; Fernandes M; Lambor R
    J Conserv Dent; 2021; 24(3):278-282. PubMed ID: 35035154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strengths between composite resin and auto cure glass ionomer cement using the co-cure technique.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Mulyani
    Aust Dent J; 2006 Jun; 51(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 16848267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 3- and 90-day bond strengths of 3 types of cement to nickel-chromium alloy.
    Ervolino ICS; Bento VAA; Brunetto JL; Laborde BFCVM; Arantes IS; Castillo DB
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(1):30-33. PubMed ID: 34978987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fiber reinforcement of a resin modified glass ionomer cement.
    Tanaka CB; Ershad F; Ellakwa A; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2020 Dec; 36(12):1516-1523. PubMed ID: 33010942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microtensile bond strength of tooth-colored materials to primary tooth dentin.
    Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 15080362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage Comparative Evaluation of RMGIC and Alkasite with and without Adhesive System in Class V Cavity: An
    Dennis D; Pintauli S; Debora S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jul; 22(7):735-738. PubMed ID: 34615776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements to Different Core Buildup Materials in Lactic Acid Buffer Solution.
    Patil SM; Kamble VB; Desai RG; Arabbi KC; Prakash V
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Aug; 9(8):ZC84-7. PubMed ID: 26436055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison study on the flexural strength and compressive strength of four resin-modified luting glass ionomer cements.
    Li Y; Lin H; Zheng G; Zhang X; Xu Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S9-17. PubMed ID: 26406090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of three different glass ionomer cements.
    Sainath Reddy TH; Venkatesh KV; Mani R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):485-488. PubMed ID: 35645076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Mixed with Water and Water-based Gel Regarding Shear Bond Strength with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite.
    Kaul R; Choudhary A; Kour S; Singh A; Kumari N; Manish K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):353-356. PubMed ID: 34267002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bond strengths of glass ionomer restoratives to primary vs permanent dentin.
    Thean HP; Mok BY; Chew CL
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(2):112-6, 82. PubMed ID: 10826046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shear bond strength of resin modified glass ionomer cement following photodynamic therapy, Er,Cr:YSGG and chlorhexidine in hypoplastic primary teeth.
    Alshami AA; Sawan NM; Alhamed SA; Helmi M; Mustafa OSE; Alsagob EI
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2021 Dec; 36():102593. PubMed ID: 34673269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.