125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38205587)
1. Validity and reliability of the Waterlow scale for assessing pressure injury risk in critical adult patients: A multi-centre cohort study.
Han L; Guo J; Zhang H; Lv L; Dong J; Zhang T; Yan F; Ma Y
J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1875-1883. PubMed ID: 38205587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the predictive validity of the Braden and Waterlow scales in intensive care unit patients: A multicentre study.
Tao H; Zhang H; Ma Y; Lv L; Pei J; Jiao Y; Han L
J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1809-1819. PubMed ID: 38031387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Validity of the Waterlow scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in the intensive care unit: a prospective analysis of 698 patients].
Compton F; Strauss M; Hortig T; Frey J; Hoffmann F; Zidek W; Schäfer JH
Pflege; 2008 Feb; 21(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 18478685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a New Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale for Patients in Intensive Care Units.
Efteli E; Güneş Ü
Wound Manag Prev; 2020 Feb; 66(2):24-33. PubMed ID: 32294059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive validity of Waterlow Scale for pressure ulcer development risk in hospitalized patients.
Serpa LF; de Gouveia Santos VL; Gomboski G; Rosado SM
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 19920745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the risk assessment pressure sore scale in intensive care patients: results of a prospective study.
Günes ÜY; Efteli E
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Apr; 61(4):58-62. PubMed ID: 25853378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale.
Charalambous C; Koulori A; Vasilopoulos A; Roupa Z
Med Arch; 2018 Apr; 72(2):141-144. PubMed ID: 29736104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-rater reliability of three most commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in clinical practice.
Wang LH; Chen HL; Yan HY; Gao JH; Wang F; Ming Y; Lu L; Ding JJ
Int Wound J; 2015 Oct; 12(5):590-4. PubMed ID: 25224688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales.
Fulbrook P; Anderson A
J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar; 72(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 26462998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale, Norton Scale, and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic.
Šateková L; Žiaková K; Zeleníková R
Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 27874258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale.
García-Molina P; Balaguer López E; Verdú J; Nolasco A; García Fernández FP
J Nurs Manag; 2018 Sep; 26(6):744-756. PubMed ID: 29656490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of the Waterlow scale and risk of pressure injury in acute care.
Webster J; Gavin N; Nicholas C; Coleman K; Gardner G
Br J Nurs; 2010 Mar 25-Apr 7; 19(6):S14, S16, S18 passim. PubMed ID: 20335924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk in critical care patients.
Serpa LF; Santos VL; Campanili TC; Queiroz M
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2011; 19(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 21412629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity, inter-rater reliability, and feasibility of the Chelsea Physical Assessment Tool for assessing physical function in post-acute COVID-19 patients: A cross-sectional study.
Giray E; Turan Z; Öke D; Topaloğlu M; Baygul A; Curci C; de Sire A; Taskiran OO
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2023; 36(3):527-539. PubMed ID: 36617777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of four pressure ulcer risk assessment tools in critically ill patients.
Theeranut A; Ninbanphot S; Limpawattana P
Nurs Crit Care; 2021 Jan; 26(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 32368844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a new risk assessment scale for predicting pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.
Suriadi ; Sanada H; Sugama J; Thigpen B; Subuh M
Nurs Crit Care; 2008; 13(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18226053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Value of detection of pentraxins 3 value combined with measurement of vascular lung water index in prognosis of patients with sepsis].
Sun R; Wang K; Li F; Yang H; Sun X
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 25591437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
