125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38205587)
21. Chinesisation, adaptation and validation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional observational study.
Zhang Z; Wang G; Wu Y; Guo J; Ding N; Jiang B; Wei H; Li B; Yue W; Tian J
BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e045550. PubMed ID: 33837104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale: a systematic review.
Kottner J; Dassen T; Tannen A
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 18986650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.
Adibelli S; Korkmaz F
J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 31491054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units.
Hyun S; Vermillion B; Newton C; Fall M; Li X; Kaewprag P; Moffatt-Bruce S; Lenz ER
Am J Crit Care; 2013 Nov; 22(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 24186823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Psychometric properties of the Braden scale to assess pressure injury risk in intensive care: A systematic review.
Mehicic A; Burston A; Fulbrook P
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2024 Aug; 83():103686. PubMed ID: 38518454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Moving average as a method of assessing risk of pressure injury using the COMHON index (Conscious level, Mobility, Hemodynamic, Oxygenation, Nutrition) for patients in intensive care units.
Arroyo-López MDC; Robayna-Delgado MDC; Chinea-Rodríguez CD; Martín-Meana C; Lorenzo-García JM; Jiménez-Sosa A
Aust Crit Care; 2022 Nov; 35(6):696-700. PubMed ID: 34924247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The clinical relevance of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale in the ICU.
Weststrate JT; Hop WC; Aalbers AG; Vreeling AW; Bruining HA
Intensive Care Med; 1998 Aug; 24(8):815-20. PubMed ID: 9757926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the pressure ulcers risk scales with critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.
Borghardt AT; Prado TN; Araújo TM; Rogenski NM; Bringuente ME
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2015; 23(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 25806628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Combined prognostic value of serum lactic acid, procalcitonin and severity score for short-term prognosis of septic shock patients].
Hao C; Hu Q; Zhu L; Xu H; Zhang Y
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2021 Mar; 33(3):281-285. PubMed ID: 33834968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.
Wei M; Wu L; Chen Y; Fu Q; Chen W; Yang D
Nurs Crit Care; 2020 May; 25(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 31985893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictive validity of the EVARUCI scale to evaluate risk for pressure injury in critical care patients.
de Souza MFC; Zanei SSV; Whitaker IY
J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(Sup8):clxi-clxv. PubMed ID: 37561701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Predictive value of six critical illness scores for 28-day death risk in comprehensive and specialized intensive care unit patients based on MIMIC-IV database].
Zhu S; Chen H; Li X; Gulifeire T; Wang Y; Yang C; Yu X
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2022 Jul; 34(7):752-758. PubMed ID: 36100416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Development of a risk assessment scale and test of its validity and reliability for venous thromboembolism in adult burn patients].
Huang M; Huang HQ; Xiong AB; Wang JX; Chen Q; Guo SM; Zheng SL
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi; 2022 Aug; 38(8):778-787. PubMed ID: 36058701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Risk factors for death in elderly patients admitted to intensive care unit after elective abdominal surgery: a consecutive 5-year retrospective study].
Li S; He T; Shen F; Wang D; Liu X; Qin J; Xiao C; Li W; Li Q; Gao D
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2021 Dec; 33(12):1453-1458. PubMed ID: 35131012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Ranzani OT; Simpson ES; Japiassú AM; Noritomi DT;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1775-1783. PubMed ID: 27463839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Validity study of the current risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in intensive care (EVARUCI)].
González-Ruiz JM; Núñez-Méndez P; Balugo-Huertas S; Navarro-de la Peña L; García-Martín MR
Enferm Intensiva; 2008; 19(3):123-29, quiz 130-1. PubMed ID: 18840327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictive validity and reliability of the Braden scale for risk assessment of pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.
Lima-Serrano M; González-Méndez MI; Martín-Castaño C; Alonso-Araujo I; Lima-Rodríguez JS
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2018 Mar; 42(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 28215408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Use of Physical Therapy ICU Assessments to Predict Discharge Home.
Tymkew H; Norris T; Arroyo C; Schallom M
Crit Care Med; 2020 Sep; 48(9):1312-1318. PubMed ID: 32639412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An evaluation of serum albumin and the sub-scores of the Waterlow score in pressure ulcer risk assessment.
Anthony D; Rafter L; Reynolds T; Aljezawi M
J Tissue Viability; 2011 Aug; 20(3):89-99. PubMed ID: 21665474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Braden scale (ALB) for assessing pressure ulcer risk in hospital patients: A validity and reliability study.
Chen HL; Cao YJ; Zhang W; Wang J; Huai BS
Appl Nurs Res; 2017 Feb; 33():169-174. PubMed ID: 28096013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
