BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38205923)

  • 1. Variation in Lymph Node Assessment for Colon Cancer at the Tumor, Surgeon, and Hospital Level.
    Egger ME; Feygin Y; Kong M; Poddar T; Ghosh I; Xu Q; McCabe RM; McMasters KM; Ellis CT
    J Am Coll Surg; 2024 Apr; 238(4):520-528. PubMed ID: 38205923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patterns of lymph node sampling and the impact of lymph node density in favorable histology Wilms tumor: An analysis of the national cancer database.
    Saltzman AF; Carrasco A; Amini A; Aldrink JH; Dasgupta R; Gow KW; Glick RD; Ehrlich PF; Cost NG
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Apr; 14(2):161.e1-161.e8. PubMed ID: 29133167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying Outlier Hospitals in Gastric Cancer Lymph Node Yield Using the National Cancer Database.
    Giambra OM; Young KA; Buonpane CL; Dove JT; Shabahang MM; Blansfield J
    J Surg Res; 2021 May; 261():196-204. PubMed ID: 33450628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in routine clinical practice: a population-based study.
    Del Paggio JC; Nanji S; Wei X; MacDonald PH; Booth CM
    Curr Oncol; 2017 Feb; 24(1):e35-e43. PubMed ID: 28270730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgeon-, pathologist-, and hospital-level variation in suboptimal lymph node examination after colectomy: Compartmentalizing quality improvement strategies.
    Becerra AZ; Aquina CT; Berho M; Boscoe FP; Schymura MJ; Noyes K; Monson JR; Fleming FJ
    Surgery; 2017 May; 161(5):1299-1306. PubMed ID: 28088321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors related to lymph node sampling at the time of surgery in children, adolescents, and young adults with unilateral non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Saltzman AF; Stokes W; Walker J; Cost NG
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 May; 15(3):259.e1-259.e7. PubMed ID: 30819622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgeon-associated variation in breast cancer staging with sentinel node biopsy.
    Larson KE; Valente SA; Tu C; Dalton J; Grobmyer SR
    Surgery; 2018 Oct; 164(4):680-686. PubMed ID: 30093273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and pathologic factors that predict lymph node yield from surgical specimens in colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
    Chou JF; Row D; Gonen M; Liu YH; Schrag D; Weiser MR
    Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11):2560-70. PubMed ID: 20499400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which is more important in the management of splenic flexure colon cancer: strict central lymph node dissection or adequate bowel resection margin?
    Yamaoka Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Hino H; Manabe S; Kato S; Hanaoka M
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Aug; 24(8):873-882. PubMed ID: 32548666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The re-evaluation of optimal lymph node yield in stage II right-sided colon cancer: is a minimum of 12 lymph nodes adequate?
    Cai Y; Cheng G; Lu X; Ju H; Zhu X
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2020 Apr; 35(4):623-631. PubMed ID: 31996986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Significant regional variation in adequacy of lymph node assessment and survival in gastric cancer.
    Coburn NG; Swallow CJ; Kiss A; Law C
    Cancer; 2006 Nov; 107(9):2143-51. PubMed ID: 17001662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical Resection Length and Harvested Lymph Nodes in Colon Cancer.
    Bostanci MT; Yilmaz I
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2021 Jul; 31(7):798-804. PubMed ID: 34271779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors associated with poor lymph node harvest after colon cancer surgery in a national cohort.
    Nedrebø BS; Søreide K; Nesbakken A; Eriksen MT; Søreide JA; Kørner H;
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e301-8. PubMed ID: 23582027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adequacy of lymph node examination in colorectal surgery: contribution of the hospital versus the surgeon.
    Rhoads KF; Ackerson LK; Ngo JV; Gray-Hazard FK; Subramanian SV; Dudley RA
    Med Care; 2013 Dec; 51(12):1055-62. PubMed ID: 23969586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of the surgeon in whether patients with lymph node-positive colon cancer see a medical oncologist.
    Luo R; Giordano SH; Zhang DD; Freeman J; Goodwin JS
    Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):975-82. PubMed ID: 17265530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variation in Hospital-Specific Rates of Suboptimal Lymphadenectomy and Survival in Colon Cancer: Evidence from the National Cancer Data Base.
    Becerra AZ; Berho ME; Probst CP; Aquina CT; Tejani MA; Gonzalez MG; Xu Z; Swanger AA; Noyes K; Monson JR; Fleming FJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):674-683. PubMed ID: 27613558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colorectal Specialization Increases Lymph Node Yield: Evidence from a National Database.
    Jeganathan AN; Shanmugan S; Bleier JI; Hall GM; Paulson EC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2258-65. PubMed ID: 26856723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of Lymph Node Sampling Minimums in Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
    Dezube AR; Mazzola E; Bravo-Iñiguez CE; De León LE; Rochefort MM; Bueno R; Wiener DC; Jaklitsch MT;
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021; 33(3):834-845. PubMed ID: 33181301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-surgical factors influencing lymph node yield in colon cancer.
    Wood P; Peirce C; Mulsow J
    World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2016 May; 8(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 27190586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgeon-led prostate cancer lymph node staging: pathological outcomes stratified by robot-assisted dissection templates and patient selection.
    Altok M; Babaian K; Achim MF; Achim GC; Troncoso P; Matin SF; Chapin BF; Davis JW
    BJU Int; 2018 Jul; 122(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 29446205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.