These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38205955)
1. Which Electronic Structure Method to Choose in Trajectory Surface Hopping Dynamics Simulations? Azomethane as a Case Study. Papineau TV; Jacquemin D; Vacher M J Phys Chem Lett; 2024 Jan; 15(2):636-643. PubMed ID: 38205955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Influence of the Electronic Structure Method on Intersystem Crossing Dynamics. The Case of Thioformaldehyde. Mai S; Atkins AJ; Plasser F; González L J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Jun; 15(6):3470-3480. PubMed ID: 31050425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonadiabatic dynamics simulation of keto isocytosine: a comparison of dynamical performance of different electronic-structure methods. Hu D; Liu YF; Sobolewski AL; Lan Z Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2017 Jul; 19(29):19168-19177. PubMed ID: 28702524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational Investigation of the Geometrical and Electronic Structures of VGe Tran VT; Nguyen MT; Tran QT J Phys Chem A; 2017 Oct; 121(40):7787-7796. PubMed ID: 28930457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benchmarking TD-DFT and Wave Function Methods for Oscillator Strengths and Excited-State Dipole Moments. Sarkar R; Boggio-Pasqua M; Loos PF; Jacquemin D J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Feb; 17(2):1117-1132. PubMed ID: 33492950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trajectory surface-hopping photoinduced dynamics from Rydberg states of trimethylamine. Pápai M; Li X; Nielsen MM; Møller KB Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2021 May; 23(18):10964-10977. PubMed ID: 33913464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benchmarking DFT Functionals for Excited-State Calculations of Donor-Acceptor TADF Emitters: Insights on the Key Parameters Determining Reverse Inter-System Crossing. Hall D; Sancho-García JC; Pershin A; Beljonne D; Zysman-Colman E; Olivier Y J Phys Chem A; 2023 Jun; 127(21):4743-4757. PubMed ID: 37196185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of dynamic correlation on the ultrafast relaxation of uracil in the gas phase. Chakraborty P; Liu Y; Weinacht T; Matsika S Faraday Discuss; 2021 May; 228(0):266-285. PubMed ID: 33566040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time Resolved Photoelectron Spectroscopy as a Test of Electronic Structure and Nonadiabatic Dynamics. Chakraborty P; Liu Y; McClung S; Weinacht T; Matsika S J Phys Chem Lett; 2021 Jun; 12(21):5099-5104. PubMed ID: 34028278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How accurate are TD-DFT excited-state geometries compared to DFT ground-state geometries? Wang J; Durbeej B J Comput Chem; 2020 Jul; 41(18):1718-1729. PubMed ID: 32323870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrafast Photoinduced Dynamics of 1,3-Cyclohexadiene Using XMS-CASPT2 Surface Hopping. Polyak I; Hutton L; Crespo-Otero R; Barbatti M; Knowles PJ J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Jul; 15(7):3929-3940. PubMed ID: 31244132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Investigation of the Accuracy of Different DFT Functionals on the Water Exchange Reaction in Hydrated Uranyl(VI) in the Ground State and the First Excited State. Wåhlin P; Danilo C; Vallet V; Réal F; Flament JP; Wahlgren U J Chem Theory Comput; 2008 Apr; 4(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 26620931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonadiabatic Coupling in Trajectory Surface Hopping: How Approximations Impact Excited-State Reaction Dynamics. Merritt ICD; Jacquemin D; Vacher M J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Mar; 19(6):1827-1842. PubMed ID: 36897995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics with subsystem density functional theory: application to crystalline pentacene. Zhang Q; Shao X; Li W; Mi W; Pavanello M; Akimov AV J Phys Condens Matter; 2024 Jun; 36(38):. PubMed ID: 38866023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Photodissociation of FONO: an excited state nonadiabatic dynamics study. Hilal AR; Hilal R J Mol Model; 2017 Mar; 23(3):77. PubMed ID: 28204944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Controls the Quality of Photodynamical Simulations? Electronic Structure Versus Nonadiabatic Algorithm. Janoš J; Slavíček P J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Nov; 19(22):8273-8284. PubMed ID: 37939301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]