These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38206063)
1. Speech Understanding and Subjective Listening Effort in Noise With Different OTEs and Sound Processing Technologies. Wesarg T; Wiebe K; Galindo Guerreros JC; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Voß B Otol Neurotol; 2024 Feb; 45(2):e91-e101. PubMed ID: 38206063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech understanding in noise for cochlear implant recipients using a spatial noise reduction setting in an off the ear sound processor with directional microphones. Jones M; Warren C; Mashal M; Greenham P; Wyss J Cochlear Implants Int; 2023 Nov; 24(6):311-324. PubMed ID: 37566646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants. Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ForwardFocus with cochlear implant recipients in spatially separated and fluctuating competing signals - introduction of a reference metric. Hey M; Hocke T; Böhnke B; Mauger SJ Int J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):869-878. PubMed ID: 31464542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. Gifford RH; Revit LJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):441-51; quiz 487-8. PubMed ID: 20807480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments. Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Listening Effort Measured With Pupillometry in Cochlear Implant Users Depends on Sound Level, But Not on the Signal to Noise Ratio When Using the Matrix Test. Stronks HC; Tops AL; Quach KW; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1461-1473. PubMed ID: 38886888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech Intelligibility in Various Noise Conditions with the Nucleus® 5 CP810 Sound Processor. Dillier N; Lai WK Audiol Res; 2015 Jun; 5(2):132. PubMed ID: 26779327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor. Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech Perception in Quiet and Noise With an Off the Ear CI Processor Enabling Adaptive Microphone Directionality. Wesarg T; Voss B; Hassepass F; Beck R; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Arndt S Otol Neurotol; 2018 Apr; 39(4):e240-e249. PubMed ID: 29533332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile. Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A state-of-the-art implementation of a binaural cochlear-implant sound coding strategy inspired by the medial olivocochlear reflex. Fumero MJ; Eustaquio-Martín A; Gorospe JM; Polo López R; Gutiérrez Revilla MA; Lassaletta L; Schatzer R; Nopp P; Stohl JS; Lopez-Poveda EA Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 409():108320. PubMed ID: 34348202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The efficacy of microphone directionality in improving speech recognition in noise for three commercial cochlear-implant systems. Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Dietz A Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 May; 21(3):153-159. PubMed ID: 32160829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users. Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users. Kerber S; Seeber BU Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Hearing Device Use on Speech-in-Noise Performance in Children with Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss. Griffin AM; Atri A; Licameli G; Stiles DJ Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):588-602. PubMed ID: 36575571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech-in-Noise Recognition With More Realistic Implementations of a Binaural Cochlear-Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex. Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Fumero MJ; Gorospe JM; Polo López R; Gutiérrez Revilla MA; Schatzer R; Nopp P; Stohl JS Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1492-1510. PubMed ID: 33136626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]