139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38206324)
1. Mitochondrial function and sexual selection: can physiology resolve the 'lek paradox'?
Crino OL; Head ML; Jennions MD; Noble DWA
J Exp Biol; 2024 Jan; 227(2):. PubMed ID: 38206324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.
Miller CW; Moore AJ
Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1279-86. PubMed ID: 17341455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
Neff BD; Pitcher TE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual selection, phenotypic plasticity and female reproductive output.
Fox RJ; Fromhage L; Jennions MD
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 374(1768):20180184. PubMed ID: 30966965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection.
Hill GE; Johnson JD
Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Oct; 280(1768):20131314. PubMed ID: 23945683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genic capture and the genetic basis of sexually selected traits in the zebra finch.
Birkhead TR; Pellatt EJ; Matthews IM; Roddis NJ; Hunter FM; McPhie F; Castillo-Juarez H
Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2389-98. PubMed ID: 17236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolutionary divergence in competitive mating success through female mating bias for good genes.
Dugand RJ; Kennington WJ; Tomkins JL
Sci Adv; 2018 May; 4(5):eaaq0369. PubMed ID: 29806021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry.
Zeh JA; Zeh DW
Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 17705058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heterozygosity-based assortative mating in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus): implications for the evolution of mate choice.
García-Navas V; Ortego J; Sanz JJ
Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Aug; 276(1669):2931-40. PubMed ID: 19474042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.
Radwan J
Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):113-27. PubMed ID: 17874278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual selection: does condition dependence fail to resolve the 'lek paradox'?
Cotton S; Pomiankowski A
Curr Biol; 2007 May; 17(9):R335-7. PubMed ID: 17470350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism and fitness outcomes in humans.
Lidborg LH; Cross CP; Boothroyd LG
Elife; 2022 Feb; 11():. PubMed ID: 35179485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
Muniz DG; Machado G
J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.
Bussière LF; Hunt J; Stölting KN; Jennions MD; Brooks R
Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17987390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
Bonduriansky R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.
Hopkins BR; Perry JC
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Aug; 97(4):1426-1448. PubMed ID: 35249265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glucocorticoids, male sexual signals, and mate choice by females: Implications for sexual selection.
Leary CJ; Baugh AT
Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Mar; 288():113354. PubMed ID: 31830474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.
Li XY; Holman L
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The lek mating system of the worm pipefish (Nerophis lumbriciformis): a molecular maternity analysis and test of the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis.
Monteiro NM; Carneiro D; Antunes A; Queiroz N; Vieira MN; Jones AG
Mol Ecol; 2017 Mar; 26(5):1371-1385. PubMed ID: 27864914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox.
Kotiaho JS; Simmons LW; Tomkins JL
Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):684-6. PubMed ID: 11287953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
