These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38206324)

  • 21. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm?
    Evans JP; Simmons LW
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 17619174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders.
    Gage MJ; Parker GA; Nylin S; Wiklund C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Nov; 269(1507):2309-16. PubMed ID: 12495497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Timing as a sexually selected trait: the right mate at the right moment.
    Hau M; Dominoni D; Casagrande S; Buck CL; Wagner G; Hazlerigg D; Greives T; Hut RA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 Nov; 372(1734):. PubMed ID: 28993493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intrasexual competition in females: evidence for sexual selection?
    Rosvall KA
    Behav Ecol; 2011 Nov; 22(6):1131-1140. PubMed ID: 22479137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Condition-dependence, pleiotropy and the handicap principle of sexual selection in melanin-based colouration.
    Roulin A
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 May; 91(2):328-48. PubMed ID: 25631160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Songs versus colours versus horns: what explains the diversity of sexually selected traits?
    Wiens JJ; Tuschhoff E
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2020 Aug; 95(4):847-864. PubMed ID: 32092241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.
    Stockley P; Bro-Jørgensen J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):341-66. PubMed ID: 20636474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variation in the peacock's train shows a genetic component.
    Petrie M; Cotgreave P; Pike TW
    Genetica; 2009 Jan; 135(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 17922297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Mitochondrial Perspective on the Demands of Reproduction.
    Hood WR
    Integr Comp Biol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38772739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Selection for costly sexual traits results in a vacant mating niche and male dimorphism.
    Hendrickx F; Vanthournout B; Taborsky M
    Evolution; 2015 Aug; 69(8):2105-17. PubMed ID: 26179673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mitonuclear Mate Choice: A Missing Component of Sexual Selection Theory?
    Hill GE
    Bioessays; 2018 Mar; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 29405334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Geographical and seasonal variation in the intensity of sexual selection in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica: a meta-analysis.
    Romano A; Costanzo A; Rubolini D; Saino N; Møller AP
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Aug; 92(3):1582-1600. PubMed ID: 27615554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The capture of heritable variation for genetic quality through social competition.
    Wolf JB; Harris WE; Royle NJ
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 17924196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Facultative adjustment of the offspring sex ratio and male attractiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Booksmythe I; Mautz B; Davis J; Nakagawa S; Jennions MD
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Feb; 92(1):108-134. PubMed ID: 26405787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relative costs and benefits of alternative reproductive phenotypes at different temperatures - genotype-by-environment interactions in a sexually selected trait.
    Plesnar-Bielak A; Skwierzyńska AM; Hlebowicz K; Radwan J
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 29996775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Endurance rivalry and female choice jointly influence male mating success in the emerald treefrog (Zhangixalus prasinatus), a lek-chorusing anuran.
    Cheng YC; Chen YH; Chang C; Chuang MF; Hsu Y
    BMC Zool; 2022 Apr; 7(1):17. PubMed ID: 37170165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.