165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38211656)
1. Aortic stenosis assessment from the 3-chamber cine: Ratio of balanced steady-state-free-precession (bSSFP) blood signal between the aorta and left ventricle predicts severity.
Vimalesvaran K; Zaman S; Howard JP; Aziminia N; Giannoudi M; Procter H; Varela M; Uslu F; Ariff B; Linton N; Levelt E; Bharath AA; Cole GD
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2024 Summer; 26(1):100005. PubMed ID: 38211656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in Aortic Valve and Left Ventricular Parameters Related to the Severity of Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Song I; Ko SM; Yi JG; Chee HK; Kim JS
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170939. PubMed ID: 28129367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 4D flow MRI, cardiac function, and T
Geiger J; Rahsepar AA; Suwa K; Powell A; Ghasemiesfe A; Barker AJ; Collins JD; Carr JC; Markl M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jul; 48(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 29206322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of aortic stenosis diagnostic parameters: comparison of fast 3 direction and 1 direction phase contrast CMR and transthoracic echocardiography.
da Silveira JS; Smyke M; Rich AV; Liu Y; Jin N; Scandling D; Dickerson JA; Rochitte CE; Raman SV; Potter LC; Ahmad R; Simonetti OP
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):35. PubMed ID: 28270219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.
Garcia J; Kadem L; Larose E; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Apr; 13(1):25. PubMed ID: 21527021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Turbulent Kinetic Energy Assessed by Multipoint 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provides Additional Information Relative to Echocardiography for the Determination of Aortic Stenosis Severity.
Binter C; Gotschy A; Sündermann SH; Frank M; Tanner FC; Lüscher TF; Manka R; Kozerke S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28611119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aortic regurgitation assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography: intermodality disagreement impacting on prediction of post-surgical left ventricular remodeling.
Neisius U; Tsao CW; Hauser TH; Patel AD; Pierce P; Ben-Assa E; Nezafat R; Manning WJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 36(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 31414256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comprehensive MR Analysis of Cardiac Function, Aortic Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Strain in Pediatric Cohort with Isolated Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
Stefek HA; Berhane H; Robinson JD; Reilly B; Ruh A; Markl M; Rigsby CK
Pediatr Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 40(7):1450-1459. PubMed ID: 31342116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps by 4D-flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve disease.
Rodríguez-Palomares JF; Dux-Santoy L; Guala A; Kale R; Maldonado G; Teixidó-Turà G; Galian L; Huguet M; Valente F; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas T; Johnson KM; Wieben O; García-Dorado D; Evangelista A
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 29695249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breath-hold and free-breathing quantitative assessment of biventricular volume and function using compressed SENSE: a clinical validation in children and young adults.
Kocaoglu M; Pednekar AS; Wang H; Alsaied T; Taylor MD; Rattan MS
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Jul; 22(1):54. PubMed ID: 32713347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-center clinical validation and quantitative assessment of respiratory triggered retrospectively cardiac gated balanced-SSFP cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in adults.
Pednekar AS; Wang H; Flamm S; Cheong BY; Muthupillai R
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jun; 20(1):44. PubMed ID: 29950177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Aortic Dilation on the Regional Aortic Stiffness of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Assessed by 4-Dimensional Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Comparison With Marfan Syndrome and Degenerative Aortic Aneurysm.
Guala A; Rodriguez-Palomares J; Dux-Santoy L; Teixido-Tura G; Maldonado G; Galian L; Huguet M; Valente F; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas T; Johnson KM; Wieben O; Sao Avilés A; Garcia-Dorado D; Evangelista A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 12(6):1020-1029. PubMed ID: 29778849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis.
Barone-Rochette G; Piérard S; Seldrum S; de Meester de Ravenstein C; Melchior J; Maes F; Pouleur AC; Vancraeynest D; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(6):1009-17. PubMed ID: 24100045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain in bicupsid aortic valve patients: head-to-head comparison between computed tomography, 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and speckle-tracking echocardiography.
van den Hoven AT; Yilmazer S; Chelu RG; van Grootel RWJ; Minderhoud SCS; Bons LR; van Berendoncks AM; Duijnhouwer AL; Siebelink HJ; van den Bosch AE; Budde RPJ; Roos-Hesselink JW; Hirsch A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Sep; 36(9):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 32451876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine learning derived segmentation of phase velocity encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance for fully automated aortic flow quantification.
Bratt A; Kim J; Pollie M; Beecy AN; Tehrani NH; Codella N; Perez-Johnston R; Palumbo MC; Alakbarli J; Colizza W; Drexler IR; Azevedo CF; Kim RJ; Devereux RB; Weinsaft JW
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Jan; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 30612574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of Time Between Left Ventricular and Aortic Systolic Pressure Peaks With Severity of Aortic Stenosis and Calcification of Aortic Valve.
Sato K; Kumar A; Jobanputra Y; Betancor J; Halane M; George R; Menon V; Krishnaswamy A; Tuzcu EM; Harb S; Jaber WA; Mick S; Svensson LG; Kapadia SR
JAMA Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 4(6):549-555. PubMed ID: 31042265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of right and left ventricular functional assessment by short-axis vs axial cine steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance imaging: intrapatient correlation with main pulmonary artery and ascending aorta phase-contrast flow measurements.
James SH; Wald R; Wintersperger BJ; Jimenez-Juan L; Deva D; Crean AM; Nguyen E; Paul NS; Ley S
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2013 Aug; 64(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 22579337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction.
Maes F; Pierard S; de Meester C; Boulif J; Amzulescu M; Vancraeynest D; Pouleur AC; Pasquet A; Gerber B; Vanoverschelde JL
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):37. PubMed ID: 28292302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
