147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38212151)
1. Long-term outcomes of pelvic-fascia sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard technique: Superior urinary function and quality of life without compromising oncologic efficacy in a single-surgeon series.
Dall CP; Mason JB; Choudhury E; Mora-Garijo B; Egan J; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
Urol Oncol; 2024 Mar; 42(3):67.e17-67.e24. PubMed ID: 38212151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series.
Kowalczyk KJ; Madi RH; Eden CG; Sooriakumaran P; Fransis K; Raskin Y; Joniau S; Johnson S; Jacobsohn K; Galfano A; Bocciardi AM; Hwang J; Kim IY; Hu JC
J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 34181471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
O'Connor-Cordova MA; Macías AGO; Sancen-Herrera JP; Altamirano-Lamarque F; Vargas Del Toro A; Peddinani BK; Canal-Zarate P; O'Connor-Juarez MA
Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 37555617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes and Safety of Suprapubic vs Urethral Catheterization Following Pelvic Fascia‒Sparing Robotic Prostatectomy.
Engelsgjerd S; Kodres-O'Brien S; Choudhury E; Garijo BM; Mason JB; Kowalczyk KJ
Urol Pract; 2024 Mar; 11(2):376-384. PubMed ID: 38051298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up.
Abdel Raheem A; Hagras A; Ghaith A; Alenzi MJ; Elghiaty A; Gameel T; Alowidah I; Ham WS; Choi YD; El-Bahnasy AH; Omar A; El-Bendary M; Rha KH
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32748620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Geraerts I; Van Poppel H; Devoogdt N; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Joniau S; Van Kampen M
BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):936-43. PubMed ID: 23937206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.
Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD
Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Facilitates Early Continence Regardless of Neurovascular Bundle Sparing.
Liao PC; Hung SC; Hu JC; Chiu KY
Anticancer Res; 2020 Jul; 40(7):4075-4080. PubMed ID: 32620655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Rosenberg JE; Jung JH; Edgerton Z; Lee H; Lee S; Bakker CJ; Dahm P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013641. PubMed ID: 32813279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.
Ong WL; Evans SM; Spelman T; Kearns PA; Murphy DG; Millar JL
BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 26573954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retzius-Sparing
Turkolmez K; Akpinar C; Kubilay E; Suer E
J Endourol; 2022 Sep; 36(9):1214-1222. PubMed ID: 35546454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching.
Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Makino T; Naito R; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Aug; 42(6):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 37096807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of fascia preservation improves the prediction of membranous urethral length and inner levator distance on continence outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Grivas N; van der Roest R; Schouten D; Cavicchioli F; Tillier C; Bex A; Schoots I; Artibani W; Heijmink S; Van Der Poel H
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Jan; 37(1):417-425. PubMed ID: 28586158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does Presence of a Median Lobe Affect Perioperative Complications, Oncological Outcomes and Urinary Continence Following Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy?
Hamidi N; Atmaca AF; Canda AE; Keske M; Gok B; Koc E; Asil E; Ardicoglu A
Urol J; 2018 Sep; 15(5):248-255. PubMed ID: 30178450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
