These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38212151)
1. Long-term outcomes of pelvic-fascia sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard technique: Superior urinary function and quality of life without compromising oncologic efficacy in a single-surgeon series. Dall CP; Mason JB; Choudhury E; Mora-Garijo B; Egan J; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ Urol Oncol; 2024 Mar; 42(3):67.e17-67.e24. PubMed ID: 38212151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide. Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series. Kowalczyk KJ; Madi RH; Eden CG; Sooriakumaran P; Fransis K; Raskin Y; Joniau S; Johnson S; Jacobsohn K; Galfano A; Bocciardi AM; Hwang J; Kim IY; Hu JC J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 34181471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis. O'Connor-Cordova MA; Macías AGO; Sancen-Herrera JP; Altamirano-Lamarque F; Vargas Del Toro A; Peddinani BK; Canal-Zarate P; O'Connor-Juarez MA Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 37555617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases. Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes and Safety of Suprapubic vs Urethral Catheterization Following Pelvic Fascia‒Sparing Robotic Prostatectomy. Engelsgjerd S; Kodres-O'Brien S; Choudhury E; Garijo BM; Mason JB; Kowalczyk KJ Urol Pract; 2024 Mar; 11(2):376-384. PubMed ID: 38051298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up. Abdel Raheem A; Hagras A; Ghaith A; Alenzi MJ; Elghiaty A; Gameel T; Alowidah I; Ham WS; Choi YD; El-Bahnasy AH; Omar A; El-Bendary M; Rha KH Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32748620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Geraerts I; Van Poppel H; Devoogdt N; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Joniau S; Van Kampen M BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):936-43. PubMed ID: 23937206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases. Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Facilitates Early Continence Regardless of Neurovascular Bundle Sparing. Liao PC; Hung SC; Hu JC; Chiu KY Anticancer Res; 2020 Jul; 40(7):4075-4080. PubMed ID: 32620655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Rosenberg JE; Jung JH; Edgerton Z; Lee H; Lee S; Bakker CJ; Dahm P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013641. PubMed ID: 32813279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry. Ong WL; Evans SM; Spelman T; Kearns PA; Murphy DG; Millar JL BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 26573954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching. Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Makino T; Naito R; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Aug; 42(6):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 37096807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of fascia preservation improves the prediction of membranous urethral length and inner levator distance on continence outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Grivas N; van der Roest R; Schouten D; Cavicchioli F; Tillier C; Bex A; Schoots I; Artibani W; Heijmink S; Van Der Poel H Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Jan; 37(1):417-425. PubMed ID: 28586158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does Presence of a Median Lobe Affect Perioperative Complications, Oncological Outcomes and Urinary Continence Following Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy? Hamidi N; Atmaca AF; Canda AE; Keske M; Gok B; Koc E; Asil E; Ardicoglu A Urol J; 2018 Sep; 15(5):248-255. PubMed ID: 30178450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients. Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]