BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38212291)

  • 1. Short- and long-term neuroplasticity interact during the perceptual learning of concurrent speech.
    MacLean J; Stirn J; Sisson A; Bidelman GM
    Cereb Cortex; 2024 Jan; 34(2):. PubMed ID: 38212291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short- and long-term experience-dependent neuroplasticity interact during the perceptual learning of concurrent speech.
    MacLean J; Stirn J; Sisson A; Bidelman GM
    bioRxiv; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37808665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Musical training orchestrates coordinated neuroplasticity in auditory brainstem and cortex to counteract age-related declines in categorical vowel perception.
    Bidelman GM; Alain C
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(3):1240-9. PubMed ID: 25609638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amplified induced neural oscillatory activity predicts musicians' benefits in categorical speech perception.
    Bidelman GM
    Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():107-113. PubMed ID: 28214576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.
    Bidelman GM; Davis MK; Pridgen MH
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():149-160. PubMed ID: 29871826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coordinated plasticity in brainstem and auditory cortex contributes to enhanced categorical speech perception in musicians.
    Bidelman GM; Weiss MW; Moreno S; Alain C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 40(4):2662-73. PubMed ID: 24890664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Passive sound exposure induces rapid perceptual learning in musicians: event-related potential evidence.
    Seppänen M; Hämäläinen J; Pesonen AK; Tervaniemi M
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Oct; 94(2):341-53. PubMed ID: 23886959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term plasticity in the auditory system: differential neural responses to perception and imagery of speech and music.
    Meyer M; Elmer S; Baumann S; Jancke L
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):411-31. PubMed ID: 17943016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention reinforces human corticofugal system to aid speech perception in noise.
    Price CN; Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jul; 235():118014. PubMed ID: 33794356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
    Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inherent auditory skills rather than formal music training shape the neural encoding of speech.
    Mankel K; Bidelman GM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Dec; 115(51):13129-13134. PubMed ID: 30509989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Plasticity in auditory categorization is supported by differential engagement of the auditory-linguistic network.
    Bidelman GM; Walker B
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 201():116022. PubMed ID: 31310863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians.
    Musacchia G; Strait D; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2008 Jul; 241(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 18562137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
    Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of language experience and stimulus context on the neural organization and categorical perception of speech.
    Bidelman GM; Lee CC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():191-200. PubMed ID: 26146197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional changes in inter- and intra-hemispheric cortical processing underlying degraded speech perception.
    Bidelman GM; Howell M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):581-590. PubMed ID: 26386346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.
    Engineer CT; Rahebi KC; Buell EP; Fink MK; Kilgard MP
    Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():256-64. PubMed ID: 25827927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.