These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38212478)

  • 1. Does preparation help to switch auditory attention between simultaneous voices: Effects of switch probability and prevalence of conflict.
    Strivens A; Koch I; Lavric A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):750-767. PubMed ID: 38212478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can we prepare to attend to one of two simultaneous voices?
    Monsell S; Lavric A; Strivens A; Paul E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jul; 45(7):966-982. PubMed ID: 31021156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intentional preparation of auditory attention-switches: Explicit cueing and sequential switch-predictability.
    Seibold JC; Nolden S; Oberem J; Fels J; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1382-1395. PubMed ID: 28631530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The persisting influence of unattended auditory information: Negative priming in intentional auditory attention switching.
    Eben C; Koch I; Jolicoeur P; Nolden S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1835-1846. PubMed ID: 31898070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossing Gender Borders: Bidirectional Dynamic Interaction Between Face-Based and Voice-Based Gender Categorization.
    Huestegge SM; Raettig T
    J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):487.e1-487.e9. PubMed ID: 32389237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive control in the cocktail party: Preparing selective attention to dichotically presented voices supports distractor suppression.
    Nolden S; Ibrahim CN; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):727-737. PubMed ID: 30569433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reward expectation modulates multiple stages of auditory conflict control.
    Kang G; Chang W; Wang L; Zhou X
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():148-156. PubMed ID: 31648025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Switching in the cocktail party: exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention.
    Koch I; Lawo V; Fels J; Vorländer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1140-7. PubMed ID: 21553997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intentional switching of auditory attention between long and short sequential tone patterns.
    Nolden S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1132-1146. PubMed ID: 28205053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Gender Cues Guide Crossmodal Selective Attending to a Gender-Congruent Voice During Dichotic Listening.
    Factor ZZ; Polack CW; Miller RR
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jul; 67(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 33111655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intentional attention switching in dichotic listening: exploring the efficiency of nonspatial and spatial selection.
    Lawo V; Fels J; Oberem J; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2010-24. PubMed ID: 25248101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intentional switching in auditory selective attention: Exploring age-related effects in a spatial setup requiring speech perception.
    Oberem J; Koch I; Fels J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():36-43. PubMed ID: 28456098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intentional switching in auditory selective attention: Exploring attention shifts with different reverberation times.
    Oberem J; Seibold J; Koch I; Fels J
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():32-39. PubMed ID: 29305038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low is large: spatial location and pitch interact in voice-based body size estimation.
    Pisanski K; Isenstein SGE; Montano KJ; O'Connor JJM; Feinberg DR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1239-1251. PubMed ID: 28229428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching.
    McCloy DR; Lau BK; Larson E; Pratt KAI; Lee AKC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2440. PubMed ID: 28464660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring "phasic" vs. "tonic" accounts of the effect of switch probability on the auditory attention switch cost.
    Strivens A; Koch I; Lavric A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; ():17470218241256361. PubMed ID: 38724482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The rapid distraction of attentional resources toward the source of incongruent stimulus input during multisensory conflict.
    Donohue SE; Todisco AE; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 25(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 23249355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching.
    Koch I; Lawo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24163154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.