162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38213184)
1. In vitro assessment of isopropanol leakage from antiseptic barrier caps into commonly used needleless connectors.
Boissière C; Bacle A; Pelletier R; Le Bouedec D; Gicquel T; Lurton Y; Le Daré B
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2024 May; 45(5):576-582. PubMed ID: 38213184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Leakage of isopropanol from port protectors used in neonatal care-Results from an in vitro study.
Hjalmarsson LB; Hagberg J; Schollin J; Ohlin A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235593. PubMed ID: 32634171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro evaluation of disinfection protocols used for needleless connectors of central venous catheters.
Mazher MA; Kallen A; Edwards JR; Donlan RM
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2013 Oct; 57(4):282-7. PubMed ID: 23710651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disinfection of needleless catheter connectors and access ports with alcohol may not prevent microbial entry: the promise of a novel antiseptic-barrier cap.
Menyhay SZ; Maki DG
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 16418982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preventing central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections: development of an antiseptic barrier cap for needleless connectors.
Menyhay SZ; Maki DG
Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):S174.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19084153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vascular catheter colonization: surveillance based on culture of needleless connectors.
Pérez-Granda MJ; Guembe M; Cruces R; Bouza E
Crit Care; 2016 May; 20(1):166. PubMed ID: 27234944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of microbial contamination on the outer surface of needleless connectors before and after disinfection.
Akbıyık A; Kaya S; Aksun M
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2023 Aug; 77():103414. PubMed ID: 36801154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disinfection of vascular catheter connectors that are protected by antiseptic caps is unnecessary.
Fillman KM; Ryder JH; Brailita DM; Rupp ME; Cavalieri RJ; Fey PD; Lyden ER; Hankins RJ
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2024 Jan; 45(1):35-39. PubMed ID: 37466074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Needleless connectors: the vascular access catheter's microbial gatekeeper.
Curran E
J Infect Prev; 2016 Sep; 17(5):234-240. PubMed ID: 28989484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized, prospective clinical trial to assess the potential infection risk associated with the PosiFlow needleless connector.
Casey AL; Worthington T; Lambert PA; Quinn D; Faroqui MH; Elliott TS
J Hosp Infect; 2003 Aug; 54(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 12919759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of the use of an antiseptic barrier cap on the rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections in neonatal and pediatric intensive care.
Helder OK; van Rosmalen J; van Dalen A; Schafthuizen L; Vos MC; Flint RB; Wildschut E; Kornelisse RF; Ista E
Am J Infect Control; 2020 Oct; 48(10):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 31948717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disinfection of needleless connectors for catheters in one second using a hand-held UV device.
Fourkas M; Takami E; Schears GJ; Farr-Jones S; Rasooly J
Am J Infect Control; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38657905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbial biofilms on needleless connectors for central venous catheters: comparison of standard and silver-coated devices collected from patients in an acute care hospital.
Perez E; Williams M; Jacob JT; Reyes MD; Chernetsky Tejedor S; Steinberg JP; Rowe L; Ganakammal SR; Changayil S; Weil MR; Donlan RM
J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Mar; 52(3):823-31. PubMed ID: 24371233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antiseptic barrier cap effective in reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Voor In 't Holt AF; Helder OK; Vos MC; Schafthuizen L; Sülz S; van den Hoogen A; Ista E
Int J Nurs Stud; 2017 Apr; 69():34-40. PubMed ID: 28130997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antiseptic barrier caps to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gillis VELM; van Es MJ; Wouters Y; Wanten GJA
Am J Infect Control; 2023 Jul; 51(7):827-835. PubMed ID: 36116679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Connectors as a risk factor for blood-associated infections (3-way stopcock and needleless connector): A randomized-experimental study.
Sengul T; Guven B; Ocakci AF; Kaya N
Am J Infect Control; 2020 Mar; 48(3):275-280. PubMed ID: 31604623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bacterial transfer and biofilm formation in needleless connectors in a clinically simulated in vitro catheter model.
Ryder M; deLancey-Pulcini E; Parker AE; James GA
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 44(11):1760-1768. PubMed ID: 37088696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A fall in bloodstream infections followed a change to 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropanol for catheter connection antisepsis: a pediatric single center before/after study on a hemopoietic stem cell transplant ward.
Soothill JS; Bravery K; Ho A; Macqueen S; Collins J; Lock P
Am J Infect Control; 2009 Oct; 37(8):626-30. PubMed ID: 19616869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive-pressure needleless connectors did not increase rates of catheter hub colonization respecting the use of neutral-pressure needleless connectors in a prospective randomized trial.
Delgado M; Capdevila JA; Sauca G; Méndez J; Rodriguez A; Yébenes JC;
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed); 2020 Mar; 38(3):119-122. PubMed ID: 31668861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of needleless connector change frequency on central line-associated bloodstream infection rate.
Sandora TJ; Graham DA; Conway M; Dodson B; Potter-Bynoe G; Margossian SP
Am J Infect Control; 2014 May; 42(5):485-9. PubMed ID: 24773786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
