139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38214381)
1. Streamlined pin-ridge-filter design for single-energy proton FLASH planning.
Ma C; Zhou J; Chang CW; Wang Y; Patel PR; Yu DS; Tian S; Yang X
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2955-2966. PubMed ID: 38214381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Streamlined Pin-Ridge-Filter Design for Single-energy Proton FLASH Planning.
Ma C; Zhou J; Chang CW; Wang Y; Patel PR; Yu DS; Tian S; Yang X
ArXiv; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37873009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver-hypofractionated radiation therapy.
Wei S; Lin H; Shi C; Xiong W; Chen CC; Huang S; Press RH; Hasan S; Chhabra AM; Choi JI; Simone CB; Kang M
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6560-6574. PubMed ID: 35929404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Integrated Physical Optimization Framework for Proton Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy FLASH Treatment Planning Allows Dose, Dose Rate, and Linear Energy Transfer Optimization Using Patient-Specific Ridge Filters.
Liu R; Charyyev S; Wahl N; Liu W; Kang M; Zhou J; Yang X; Baltazar F; Palkowitsch M; Higgins K; Dynan W; Bradley J; Lin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Jul; 116(4):949-959. PubMed ID: 36736634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility study of hybrid inverse planning with transmission beams and single-energy spread-out Bragg peaks for proton FLASH radiotherapy.
Ma C; Yang X; Chang CW; Liu R; Bohannon D; Lin L; Liu T; Tian S; Zhou J
Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 50(6):3687-3700. PubMed ID: 36932635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design of static and dynamic ridge filters for FLASH-IMPT: A simulation study.
Zhang G; Gao W; Peng H
Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5387-5399. PubMed ID: 35595708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advanced pencil beam scanning Bragg peak FLASH-RT delivery technique can enhance lung cancer planning treatment outcomes compared to conventional multiple-energy proton PBS techniques.
Wei S; Lin H; Isabelle Choi J; Shi C; Simone CB; Kang M
Radiother Oncol; 2022 Oct; 175():238-247. PubMed ID: 35961583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous dose and dose rate optimization (SDDRO) of the FLASH effect for pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy.
Gao H; Liu J; Lin Y; Gan GN; Pratx G; Wang F; Langen K; Bradley JD; Rotondo RL; Li HH; Chen RC
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):2014-2025. PubMed ID: 34800301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility study of multiple-energy Bragg peak proton FLASH on a superconducting gantry with large momentum acceptance.
Zeng Y; Li H; Wang W; Liu X; Qin B; Dai S; Pang B; Liu M; Quan H; Yang K; Chang Y; Yang Z
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2164-2174. PubMed ID: 38169535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards FLASH proton therapy: the impact of treatment planning and machine characteristics on achievable dose rates.
van de Water S; Safai S; Schippers JM; Weber DC; Lomax AJ
Acta Oncol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):1463-1469. PubMed ID: 31241377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A Universal Range Shifter and Range Compensator Can Enable Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Single-Energy Bragg Peak FLASH-RT Treatment Using Current Commercially Available Proton Systems.
Kang M; Wei S; Choi JI; Lin H; Simone CB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2022 May; 113(1):203-213. PubMed ID: 35101597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FLASH radiotherapy sparing effect on the circulating lymphocytes in pencil beam scanning proton therapy: impact of hypofractionation and dose rate.
Galts A; Hammi A
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jan; 69(2):. PubMed ID: 38081067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Intensity modulated proton arc therapy via geometry-based energy selection for ependymoma.
Cao W; Li Y; Zhang X; Poenisch F; Yepes P; Sahoo N; Grosshans D; McGovern S; Gunn GB; Frank SJ; Zhu XR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13954. PubMed ID: 36913484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small-spot intensity-modulated proton versus volumetric-modulated arc therapies.
Liu C; Bhangoo RS; Sio TT; Yu NY; Shan J; Chiang JS; Ding JX; Rule WG; Korte S; Lara P; Ding X; Bues M; Hu Y; DeWees T; Ashman JB; Liu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):15-27. PubMed ID: 31112371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization techniques for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a clinical case study.
Yeung D; McKenzie C; Indelicato DJ
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2014 Jan; 61(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 24000229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A treatment planning comparison of intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for paraspinal sarcomas.
Weber DC; Trofimov AV; Delaney TF; Bortfeld T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1596-606. PubMed ID: 15050341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Liu C; Yu NY; Shan J; Bhangoo RS; Daniels TB; Chiang JS; Ding X; Lara P; Patrick CL; Archuleta JP; DeWees T; Hu Y; Schild SE; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4755-4762. PubMed ID: 31498885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
