BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38214848)

  • 1. A Review of Current Approaches to Evaluating and Reimbursing New Medicines in a Subset of OECD Countries.
    Zozaya N; Villaseca J; Fernández I; Abdalla F; Cadenas-Noreña B; Calleja MÁ; Gómez-Pajuelo P; Mestre-Ferrándiz J; Oliva-Moreno J; Trillo JL; Hidalgo-Vega Á
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2024 May; 22(3):297-313. PubMed ID: 38214848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods for the comparative evaluation of pharmaceuticals.
    Zentner A; Velasco-Garrido M; Busse R
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2005 Nov; 1():Doc09. PubMed ID: 21289930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health technology assessment for cancer medicines across the G7 countries and Oceania: an international, cross-sectional study.
    Jenei K; Raymakers AJN; Bayle A; Berger-Thürmel K; Cherla A; Honda K; Jackson CCGA; Karikios D; Trapani D; Berry S; Gyawali B
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Jun; 24(6):624-635. PubMed ID: 37269843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.
    Levy AR; Mitton C; Johnston KM; Harrigan B; Briggs AH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(10):813-30. PubMed ID: 20831289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HTA decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: comparison of processes across countries.
    Stafinski T; Glennie J; Young A; Menon D
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Jul; 17(1):258. PubMed ID: 35804398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative effectiveness assessments of oncology medicines for pricing and reimbursement decisions in European countries.
    Kleijnen S; Lipska I; Leonardo Alves T; Meijboom K; Elsada A; Vervölgyi V; d'Andon A; Timoney A; Leufkens HG; De Boer A; Goettsch WG
    Ann Oncol; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1768-75. PubMed ID: 27329251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries.
    Angelis A; Lange A; Kanavos P
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Jan; 19(1):123-152. PubMed ID: 28303438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of new medicines in Spain and comparison with other European countries.
    Epstein D; Espín J
    Gac Sanit; 2020; 34(2):133-140. PubMed ID: 31027840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value and Price of Multi-indication Cancer Drugs in the USA, Germany, France, England, Canada, Australia, and Scotland.
    Michaeli DT; Mills M; Kanavos P
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2022 Sep; 20(5):757-768. PubMed ID: 35821360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative analysis of two contrasting European approaches for rewarding the value added by drugs for cancer: England versus France.
    Drummond M; de Pouvourville G; Jones E; Haig J; Saba G; Cawston H
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 May; 32(5):509-20. PubMed ID: 24599784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What factors are considered in hospital funding models? A review of the literature on health services funding in organisation for economic co-operation and development countries.
    Clay-Williams R; Zurynski Y; Long JC; Meulenbroeks I; Austin EE; Mahmoud Z; Ellis LA; Knaggs G; Fajardo Pulido D; Richardson L; Ahlenstiel G; Reece G; Braithwaite J
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2023 Sep; 38(5):1228-1249. PubMed ID: 37469119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Review of Current Approaches to Defining and Valuing Innovation in Health Technology Assessment.
    Hofmann S; Branner J; Misra A; Lintener H
    Value Health; 2021 Dec; 24(12):1773-1783. PubMed ID: 34838275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe.
    Zamora B; Maignen F; O'Neill P; Mestre-Ferrandiz J; Garau M
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2019 May; 14(1):95. PubMed ID: 31053154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Algorithms and heuristics of health technology assessments: A retrospective analysis of factors associated with HTA outcomes for new drugs across seven OECD countries.
    Kanavos P; Visintin E; Gentilini A
    Soc Sci Med; 2023 Aug; 331():116045. PubMed ID: 37450991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Case Studies: Factors Influencing Divergent HTA Reimbursement Recommendations in Australia, Canada, England, and Scotland.
    Allen N; Walker SR; Liberti L; Salek S
    Value Health; 2017 Mar; 20(3):320-328. PubMed ID: 28292476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unravelling drug reimbursement outcomes: a comparative study of the role of pharmacoeconomic evidence in Dutch and Swedish reimbursement decision making.
    Franken M; Nilsson F; Sandmann F; de Boer A; Koopmanschap M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Sep; 31(9):781-97. PubMed ID: 23839699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Payer Perspectives on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Health Care Decision Making: Oncology Examples.
    Brogan AP; DeMuro C; Barrett AM; D'Alessio D; Bal V; Hogue SL
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Feb; 23(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 28125369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.