These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3821487)

  • 1. Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography.
    Bentin S; Frost R
    Mem Cognit; 1987 Jan; 15(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 3821487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From sound to meaning: Phonology-to-Semantics mapping in visual word recognition.
    Amenta S; Marelli M; Sulpizio S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):887-893. PubMed ID: 27572870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
    Alija M; Cuetos F
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of lexical expertise in reading homophones.
    Burt JS; Jared D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1302-21. PubMed ID: 26158491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.
    Chumbley JI; Balota DA
    Mem Cognit; 1984 Nov; 12(6):590-606. PubMed ID: 6533428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: the case of the regularity effect.
    Ziegler JC; Perry C; Coltheart M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):947-53. PubMed ID: 15000543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition.
    Marelli M; Amenta S; Crepaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 25269473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning to spell in a language with transparent orthography: Distributional properties of orthography and whole-word lexical processing.
    Angelelli P; Marinelli CV; Putzolu A; Notarnicola A; Iaia M; Burani C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):704-716. PubMed ID: 28052739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual word recognition is accompanied by covert articulation: evidence for a speech-like phonological representation.
    Eiter BM; Inhoff AW
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 18843502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing segmental and prosodic information in Cantonese word production.
    Wong AW; Chen HC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1172-90. PubMed ID: 18763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision.
    Wile TL; Borowsky R
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):47-62. PubMed ID: 15172524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words.
    Marelli M; Amenta S
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1482-1495. PubMed ID: 29372490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition.
    Lee CH; Taft M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 21327354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word and pseudoword superiority effects: Evidence from a shallow orthography language.
    Ripamonti E; Luzzatti C; Zoccolotti P; Traficante D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):1911-1920. PubMed ID: 28770652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonological and orthographic coding in deaf skilled readers.
    Fariña N; Duñabeitia JA; Carreiras M
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():27-33. PubMed ID: 28646750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When does reading dirty words impede picture processing? Taboo interference with verbal and manual responses.
    Mädebach A; Markuske AM; Jescheniak JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2301-2308. PubMed ID: 29790121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The strong, the weak, and the first: The impact of phonological stress on processing of orthographic errors in silent reading.
    Kriukova O; Mani N
    Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 1636():208-218. PubMed ID: 26790350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.