These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38215073)

  • 21. A comparison of exact tests for trend with binary endpoints using Bartholomew's statistic.
    Consiglio JD; Shan G; Wilding GE
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 25324456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A conditional error function approach for adaptive enrichment designs with continuous endpoints.
    Placzek M; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(17):3105-3122. PubMed ID: 31066093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two treatments with skewed ordinal responses.
    Lu TY; Poon WY; Cheung SH
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 26289419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Data Analyses When Sample Sizes Are Small: Modern Advances for Dealing With Outliers, Skewed Distributions, and Heteroscedasticity.
    Wilcox R; Peterson TJ; McNitt-Gray JL
    J Appl Biomech; 2018 Aug; 34(4):258-261. PubMed ID: 30045651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A mixture model approach to sample size estimation in two-sample comparative microarray experiments.
    Jørstad TS; Midelfart H; Bones AM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():117. PubMed ID: 18298817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determining sample size for a binary diagnostic test in the presence of verification bias.
    Shan G; Zhang H; Jiang T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1193-1202. PubMed ID: 29553878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing survival curves based on medians.
    Chen Z; Zhang G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():33. PubMed ID: 26983640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A mixture-model approach for parallel testing for unequal variances.
    Bar HY; Booth JG; Wells MT
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Jan; 11(1):Article 8. PubMed ID: 22499680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A robust Pearson correlation test for a general point null using a surrogate bootstrap distribution.
    Hutson AD
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216287. PubMed ID: 31095591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sample size and statistical power assessing the effect of interventions in the context of mixture distributions with detection limits.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2647-57. PubMed ID: 16456897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Confidence interval estimation of the common mean of several gamma populations.
    Yan L
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269971. PubMed ID: 35714130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Traditional and proposed tests of slope homogeneity for non-normal and heteroscedastic data.
    Moses TP; Klockars AJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):402-26. PubMed ID: 22053808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sample size calculation in three-level cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3347-3372. PubMed ID: 32720717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Location tests for biomarker studies: a comparison using simulations for the two-sample case.
    Scheinhardt MO; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 23877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.
    Fay MP; Proschan MA; Brittain E
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 25274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment on homogeneity tests for kappa statistics under equal prevalence across studies in reliability.
    Nam JM
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1521-31. PubMed ID: 16220477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Heterogeneous heterogeneity by default: Testing categorical moderators in mixed-effects meta-analysis.
    Rodriguez JE; Williams DR; Bürkner PC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 May; 76(2):402-433. PubMed ID: 36733223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microarray data analysis: a hierarchical T-test to handle heteroscedasticity.
    de Menezes RX; Boer JM; van Houwelingen HC
    Appl Bioinformatics; 2004; 3(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 15702953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical analysis of noninferiority trials with a rate ratio in small-sample matched-pair designs.
    Chan IS; Tang NS; Tang ML; Chan PS
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1170-7. PubMed ID: 14969498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.