These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3821601)

  • 1. A reappraisal of the use of the phi-coefficient in multiple choice examinations.
    Koeslag JH; Schach SR; Melzer CW
    Med Educ; 1987 Jan; 21(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 3821601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple-choice testing in anatomy.
    Nnodim JO
    Med Educ; 1992 Jul; 26(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 1630332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of a 'don't know' option on test scores: number-right and formula scoring compared.
    Muijtjens AM; Mameren HV; Hoogenboom RJ; Evers JL; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 1999 Apr; 33(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 10336757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.
    Notebaert AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized controlled trial comparing instructions regarding unsafe response options in a MCQ examination.
    Tweed M; Wilkinson T
    Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 18825569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple choice questions: to guess or not to guess.
    McG Harden R; Brown RA; Biran LA; Ross WP; Wakeford RE
    Med Educ; 1976 Jan; 10(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 1263885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criterion-based open book examinations in physiology.
    Naeraa N; Huxham G
    Med Educ; 1980 Mar; 14(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 7366499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper.
    Sim SM; Rasiah RI
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Feb; 35(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 16565756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple choice questions revisited.
    Anderson J
    Med Teach; 2004 Mar; 26(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 15203517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inversions in true/false and in multiple choice questions -- a new form of item analysis.
    Koeslag JH; Melzer CW; Schach SR
    Med Educ; 1979 Nov; 13(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 537531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pattern of answer changes to multiple choice questions in physiology.
    Shahabudin SH
    Med Educ; 1983 Sep; 17(5):316-8. PubMed ID: 6621433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is Bloom's Taxonomy reflected in the response pattern to MCQ items?
    Huxham GJ; Naeraa N
    Med Educ; 1980 Jan; 14(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 7366491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of testing with multiple choice versus open-ended questions: Outcome-based observations in an anatomy course.
    Melovitz Vasan CA; DeFouw DO; Holland BK; Vasan NS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 28941215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?
    Pham H; Trigg M; Wu S; O'Connell A; Harry C; Barnard J; Devitt P
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2018; 31(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 30531047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing a script concordance examination to a multiple-choice examination on a core internal medicine clerkship.
    Kelly W; Durning S; Denton G
    Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 22775780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of a utility analysis to evaluate a novel assessment tool for clinically oriented physiology and pharmacology.
    Cramer N; Asmar A; Gorman L; Gros B; Harris D; Howard T; Hussain M; Salazar S; Kibble JD
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Sep; 40(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 27445277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A trial of multiple choice examination in pharmacology.
    Gandhi IS; Ghosh MN
    Med Educ; 1978 Jul; 12(4):287-9. PubMed ID: 672700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards a rational approach to student evaluation by examinations.
    Fredman M
    Med Educ; 1979 Nov; 13(6):414-9. PubMed ID: 537530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method for measuring interrater agreement on checklists.
    Sinacore JM; Connell KJ; Olthoff AJ; Friedman MH; Gecht MR
    Eval Health Prof; 1999 Jun; 22(2):221-34. PubMed ID: 10557857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of medical students in radiology. Written testing using uncued multiple-choice questions.
    Fajardo LL; Chan KM
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Oct; 28(10):964-8. PubMed ID: 8262753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.