These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38216374)

  • 21. Why Do Vascular Surgeons Get Sued? Analysis of Claims and Outcomes in Malpractice Litigation.
    Phair J; Trestman EB; Skripochnik E; Lipsitz EC; Koleilat I; Scher LA
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 51():25-29. PubMed ID: 29758323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A 20-Year Analysis of Adverse Events and Litigation With Light-Based Skin Resurfacing Procedures.
    Halepas S; Lee KC; Higham ZL; Ferneini EM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Apr; 78(4):619-628. PubMed ID: 31991097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of reasons for medical malpractice litigation due to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Arif H; Razzouk J; Bohen D; Ramos O; Danisa O; Cheng P; Cheng W
    World Neurosurg X; 2024 Jul; 23():100371. PubMed ID: 38618270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Physician and patients factors associated with outcome of spinal epidural abscess related malpractice litigation.
    Shantharam G; DePasse JM; Eltorai AEM; Durand WM; Palumbo MA; Daniels AH
    Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2018 Sep; 10(3):7693. PubMed ID: 30370036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of reasons for medical malpractice litigation due to laminectomy.
    Bouterse A; Razzouk J; Bohen D; Ramos O; Danisa O; Cheng WK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 May; 38(5):607-616. PubMed ID: 36738465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Epistaxis: the factors involved in determining medicolegal liability.
    Khan MN; Blake DM; Vazquez A; Setzen M; Baredes S; Eloy JA
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2014 Jan; 4(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 24124068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An Analysis of Medical Malpractice Litigation Involving Orbital Fractures.
    Brozynski M; Seyidova N; Oleru O; Rew C; Loschpe ADV; Taub PJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38597600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Malpractice Litigation for Compartment Syndrome.
    Phair J; Carnevale M; Scher LA; Garg K
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2020 Aug; 67():143-147. PubMed ID: 32339693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Medical Malpractice Trends in Dacryocystorhinostomy and Orbital Decompression.
    Tang DM; Goli R; Higgins TS; Ting JY; Illing EA; Wu AW
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2022 Nov; 36(6):835-840. PubMed ID: 36214169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medical Malpractice Litigation Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive, Nationwide Analysis of the Past Decade.
    Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Rabin JM; Surace PA; Yao B; Moskal JT; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S102-S107. PubMed ID: 30935800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Legal Review of Vasectomy Litigation and the Variables Impacting Trial Outcomes.
    Blazek AJ; Belle JD; Deibert MP; Deibert CM
    Urology; 2019 Sep; 131():120-124. PubMed ID: 31195010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dissecting malpractice in pancreaticoduodenectomy cases.
    Anandalwar SP; Scholer AJ; Ninan G; Oliver JB; Christian D; Eloy JA; Chokshi RJ
    J Surg Res; 2017 May; 212():48-53. PubMed ID: 28550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Medical Malpractice Claims Following Incidental Durotomy Due to Spinal Surgery.
    Durand WM; Eltorai AEM; Shantharam G; DePasse JM; Kuris EO; Hersey AE; Palumbo MA; Daniels AH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jul; 43(13):940-945. PubMed ID: 29200173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An analysis of malpractice litigation in the surgical management of carotid artery disease.
    Haslett JJ; LaBelle LA; Zhang X; Mocco J; Bederson J; Kellner CP
    J Neurosurg; 2019 May; 132(6):1900-1906. PubMed ID: 31125965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Malpractice Litigation Following Traumatic Fracture.
    Ahmed SA; DeFroda SF; Naqvi SJ; Eltorai AEM; Hartnett D; Ruddell JH; Born CT; Daniels AH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Apr; 101(7):e27. PubMed ID: 30946201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lasers and losers in the eyes of the law: liability for head and neck procedures.
    Svider PF; Carron MA; Zuliani GF; Eloy JA; Setzen M; Folbe AJ
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2014; 16(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 24744090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of in court malpractice litigation following pancreatic surgery.
    Anteby R; Lillemoe KD; Fernández-Del Castillo C; Ferrone CR; Qadan M
    Pancreatology; 2021 Jun; 21(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 33653655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Review of Malpractice Litigation in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous & Lymphatic Disease.
    Choinski K; Sanon O; Sacknovitz Y; Ilonzo N; Ting W; Koleilat I; Phair J
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2023 Jan; 88():274-282. PubMed ID: 35926792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An Analysis of Medical Malpractice Litigation due to Intravenous Steroid Treatment for Acute Spinal Cord Injury.
    Razzouk J; Mehta S; Ramos O; Danisa O; Cheng W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Sep; 48(17):E302-E305. PubMed ID: 37163642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medical malpractice in robotic surgery: a Westlaw database analysis.
    De Ravin E; Sell EA; Newman JG; Rajasekaran K
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Feb; 17(1):191-196. PubMed ID: 35554817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.