These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38218657)

  • 1. Effect of changing multiple choice questions from "all of the above" to "select all that apply".
    Dell KA; DeVries DM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2024 Mar; 16(3):174-177. PubMed ID: 38218657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.
    Chauhan GR; Chauhan BR; Vaza JV; Chauhan PR
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42492. PubMed ID: 37644928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options.
    Fozzard N; Pearson A; du Toit E; Naug H; Wen W; Peak IR
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):252. PubMed ID: 30404624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative analysis of single best answer multiple choice questions in pharmaceutics.
    Al Muhaissen SA; Ratka A; Akour A; AlKhatib HS
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Mar; 11(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 30904146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Item statistics derived from three-option versions of multiple-choice questions are usually as robust as four- or five-option versions: implications for exam design.
    Loudon C; Macias-Muñoz A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2018 Dec; 42(4):565-575. PubMed ID: 30192185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions.
    Chandratilake M; Davis M; Ponnamperuma G
    Natl Med J India; 2011; 24(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 22208143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items.
    Rezigalla AA; Eleragi AMESA; Elhussein AB; Alfaifi J; ALGhamdi MA; Al Ameer AY; Yahia AIO; Mohammed OA; Adam MIE
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):445. PubMed ID: 38658912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postexamination item analysis of undergraduate pediatric multiple-choice questions exam: implications for developing a validated question Bank.
    Rashwan NI; Aref SR; Nayel OA; Rizk MH
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 24(1):168. PubMed ID: 38383427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
    Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
    Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Item analysis and optimizing multiple-choice questions for a viable question bank in ophthalmology: A cross-sectional study.
    Bhat SK; Prasad KHL
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 69(2):343-346. PubMed ID: 33463588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
    Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the effect of items' format and type on psychometric properties of sixth year pharmacy students clinical clerkship assessment items.
    AlKhatib HS; Brazeau G; Akour A; Almuhaissen SA
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Jun; 20(1):190. PubMed ID: 32532278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of long-menu and single-best-answer multiple choice questions in computer-based summative assessments: a randomised controlled trial.
    Cerutti B; Stollar F; Escher M; Blondon K; Aujesky S; Nendaz M; Galetto-Lacour A
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):219. PubMed ID: 31215430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.
    Vegada B; Shukla A; Khilnani A; Charan J; Desai C
    Indian J Pharmacol; 2016; 48(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 27721545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An experimental comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions on a high-stakes test for medical students.
    Mee J; Pandian R; Wolczynski J; Morales A; Paniagua M; Harik P; Baldwin P; Clauser BE
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Jul; 29(3):783-801. PubMed ID: 37665413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A psychometric analysis of a newly developed summative, multiple choice question assessment adapted from Canada to a Middle Eastern context.
    Pawluk SA; Shah K; Minhas R; Rainkie D; Wilby KJ
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Aug; 10(8):1026-1032. PubMed ID: 30314537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Student perception and post-exam analysis of one best MCQs and one correct MCQs: A comparative study.
    Adhi MI; Aly SM
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2018 Apr; 68(4):570-575. PubMed ID: 29808047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison in the quality of distractors in three and four options type of multiple choice questions.
    Rahma NAA; Shamad MMA; Idris MEA; Elfaki OA; Elfakey WEM; Salih KMA
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2017; 8():287-291. PubMed ID: 28442942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are Multiple Choice Questions for Post Graduate Dental Entrance Examinations Spot On?-Item Analysis of MCQs in Prosthodontics in India.
    Shigli K; Nayak SS; Gali S; Sankeshwari B; Fulari D; Shyam Kishore K; Upadhya P N; Jirge V
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2018 Oct; 110(5):455-458. PubMed ID: 30129514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.