These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3821880)
1. Supreme Court reverses AIDS judgment. Heneson N Nature; 1987 Mar 12-18; 326(6109):115. PubMed ID: 3821880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The constitutional implications of mandatory testing for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome--AIDS. Levy SJ Emory Law J; 1988; 37(1):217-48. PubMed ID: 11652522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Handicap rights: even AIDS seems covered. Lacayo R Time; 1987 Mar; 129(11):66. PubMed ID: 11653764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Asymptomatic infection with the AIDS virus as a handicap under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Kushen RA Columbia Law Rev; 1988 Apr; 88(3):563-86. PubMed ID: 11651916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. AIDS and employment: asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus carriers and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Turner R AIDS Public Policy J; 1990; 5(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 11650976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Arline, Chalk, the Civil Rights Restoration Act, and the AIDS handicap. Turner R AIDS Public Policy J; 1988; 3(3):23-30. PubMed ID: 11650099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. AIDS and ERISA preemption: the double threat. Bruner JR Duke Law J; 1992 Apr; 41(5):1115-56. PubMed ID: 11654910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. AIDS goes to court. Lacayo R Time; 1986 Dec; 128(23):73. PubMed ID: 11653773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. AIDS discrimination under federal, state, and local law after Arline. Wasson RP Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 15(2):221-78. PubMed ID: 11658972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Admission of AIDS patients to the long-term care facility: protections under federal and Washington State law. Roche RJ Gonzaga Law Rev; 1988-1989; 24(1):85-106. PubMed ID: 11653893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Capping health insurance benefits for AIDS: an analysis of disability-based distinctions under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Eisenstat S J Law Polit; 1993; 10(1):1-49. PubMed ID: 11654924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rationality review and the politics of public health. Burris S Villanova Law Rev; 1989 Sep; 34(5):933-82. PubMed ID: 11651166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When rape victims' rights meet privacy rights: mandatory HIV testing, striking the fourth amendment balance. Sadler BP Wash Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 67(1):195-213. PubMed ID: 11652670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. AIDS and employment discrimination: should AIDS be considered a handicap? Curylo PA Wayne Law Rev; 1987; 33(3):1095-110. PubMed ID: 11651885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Chalk v. United States District Court, Central District of California. Di Somma AV Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):225. PubMed ID: 11644324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In search of a balance: AIDS, rape, and the special needs doctrine. Simotas L N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 66(6):1881-928. PubMed ID: 11652643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is school for all? AIDS victims spark dilemma. Silas FA; Frank C ABA J; 1985 Nov; 71():18-9. PubMed ID: 11653670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Employment discrimination against persons with AIDS. Leonard AS Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1985; 10(3):681-703. PubMed ID: 11651852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. AIDS: does it qualify as a "handicap" under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973? Shumaker GM Notre Dame Law Rev; 1986; 61(3):572-94. PubMed ID: 11651868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. AIDS, rape, and the Fourth Amendment: schemes for mandatory testing of sex offenders. MacDonald PH Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 43(5):1607-36. PubMed ID: 11652583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]