138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38218851)
1. Odontoid incidence: a constant cervical anatomical feature evident in standing plain radiographs and supine magnetic resonance images.
Huang L; Chen W; Xu H; Qin H; Jiang H
J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):63. PubMed ID: 38218851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Significance of Odontoid Incidence in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
Qin H; Chen W; Huang L; Xiao X; Yang Q; Jiang H
Global Spine J; 2023 Jun; ():21925682231182342. PubMed ID: 37288774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Impact and Correlations of Odontoid Parameters Following Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery.
Lee JK; Hyun SJ; Yang SH; Kim KJ
Neurospine; 2022 Dec; 19(4):912-920. PubMed ID: 36597628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Odontoid Incidence: A Novel Cervical Parameter Influencing Cervical Alignment From Top to Bottom.
Lee JK; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ
Neurospine; 2022 Jun; 19(2):463-471. PubMed ID: 35793937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is it possible to evaluate upper and lower cervical interdependency on supine magnetic resonance imaging?
Hamza K; Ahmet IC
Ideggyogy Sz; 2023 Jul; 76(7-8):245-252. PubMed ID: 37471199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI to measure cervical sagittal parameters: a comparison with plain radiographs.
Xing R; Zhou G; Chen Q; Liang Y; Dong J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Apr; 137(4):451-455. PubMed ID: 28180991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Cervical Degeneration and Sagittal Balance on Retro-Odontoid Soft-Tissue Thickness.
Wu J; Pan P; Chang Y; Chen F; Yang J; Wu L; Ni B; Guo Q
World Neurosurg; 2024 Feb; 182():e231-e235. PubMed ID: 38008169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical mismatch: the normative value of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis and its ability to predict ideal cervical lordosis.
Staub BN; Lafage R; Kim HJ; Shaffrey CI; Mundis GM; Hostin R; Burton D; Lenke L; Gupta MC; Ames C; Klineberg E; Bess S; Schwab F; Lafage V;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Oct; 30(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 30485176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation and differences in cervical sagittal alignment parameters between cervical radiographs and magnetic resonance images.
Oshina M; Tanaka M; Oshima Y; Tanaka S; Riew KD
Eur Spine J; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1408-1415. PubMed ID: 29572735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging: A possible alternative to a standing lateral radiograph for evaluating cervical sagittal alignment in patients with cervical disc herniation?
Liu W; Fan J; Bai J; Tang P; Chen J; Luo Y; Zhou K; Cai W
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(39):e8194. PubMed ID: 28953681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment.
Lee SH; Son ES; Seo EM; Suk KS; Kim KT
Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):705-12. PubMed ID: 24021619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive formula of cervical lordosis in asymptomatic young population.
Zhu Y; An Z; Zhang Y; Wei H; Dong L
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):2. PubMed ID: 31900173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of cervical and thoracic inlet sagittal parameters by MRI and radiography in patients with cervical spondylosis.
Cheng J; Liu P; Sun D; Ma Z; Liu J; Wang Z; Mou J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(7):e14393. PubMed ID: 30762740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. K-line tilt as a novel radiographic parameter in cervical sagittal alignment.
Kim HS; Kim TH; Park MS; Kim SW; Chang HG; Kim JH; Ahn JH; Chang IB; Song JH; Oh JK
Eur Spine J; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2023-2028. PubMed ID: 29855725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does Preoperative T1 Slope and Cervical Lordosis Mismatching Affect Surgical Outcomes After Laminoplasty in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?
Rao H; Huang Y; Lan Z; Xu Z; Li G; Xu W
World Neurosurg; 2019 Oct; 130():e687-e693. PubMed ID: 31279919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Analysis of Three Imaging Modalities for Evaluation of Cervical Sagittal Alignment Parameters: A Validity and Reliability Study.
Lee HD; Jeon CH; Chung NS; Kwon HJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):1901-1907. PubMed ID: 28574884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnitude of preoperative cervical lordotic compensation and C2-T3 angle are correlated to increased risk of postoperative sagittal spinal pelvic malalignment in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.
Passias PG; Soroceanu A; Scheer J; Yang S; Boniello A; Smith JS; Protopsaltis T; Kim HJ; Schwab F; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Mundis G; Lafage R; Hart R; Shaffrey C; Lafage V; Ames C;
Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1756-63. PubMed ID: 25862507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analyzing the Significance of T1 Slope minus Cervical Lordosis in Patients with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery.
Lee HJ; You ST; Sung JH; Kim IS; Hong JT
J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2021 Nov; 64(6):913-921. PubMed ID: 34749484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Impact of T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis After Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery: A Minimum 2-Year Follow Up Data.
Hyun SJ; Kim KJ; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):1859-1864. PubMed ID: 28542101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship Between T1 Slope Minus C2-7 Lordosis and Cervical Alignment Parameters After Adjacent 2-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion of Lower Cervical Spine.
Lan Z; Huang Y; Xu W
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e1195-e1201. PubMed ID: 30447441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
