173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38219158)
1. Radiotherapy of prostate and head-and-neck tumour: An optimal treatment planning comparison for intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arctherapy techniques.
Murtaza G
J Pak Med Assoc; 2024 Jan; 74(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 38219158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimisation of user-selectable volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning parameters: VMAT arcs for prostate and head-and-neck cancers.
Murtaza G; Gillani ZA; Mehmood S; ; Khan EU
J Pak Med Assoc; 2021 Apr; 71(4):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 34125749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of standard intensity-modulated radiotherapy and RapidArc planning techniques for ipsilateral and bilateral head and neck irradiation.
Pursley J; Damato AL; Czerminska MA; Margalit DN; Sher DJ; Tishler RB
Med Dosim; 2017 Spring; 42(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 27919621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the relative insensitivity of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan quality to gantry space resolution.
Murtaza G; Cora S; Khan EU
J Radiat Res; 2017 Jul; 58(4):579-590. PubMed ID: 27974507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. VMAT partial arc technique decreases dose to organs at risk in whole pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer when compared to full arc VMAT and IMRT.
Bartlett GK; Njeh CF; Huang KC; DesRosiers C; Guo G
Med Dosim; 2023 Spring; 48(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 36319515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the feasibility of volumetric-modulated arc therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT): An analysis for complex head-neck, high-risk prostate and rectal cancer cases.
Cilla S; Deodato F; Digesù C; Macchia G; Picardi V; Ferro M; Sallustio G; De Spirito M; Piermattei A; Morganti AG
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 24342167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of head and neck cancer.
Bertelsen A; Hansen CR; Johansen J; Brink C
Radiother Oncol; 2010 May; 95(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 20188427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of gantry rotation time on plan quality and dosimetric verification--volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
Pasler M; Wirtz H; Lutterbach J
Strahlenther Onkol; 2011 Dec; 187(12):812-9. PubMed ID: 22127360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for large volume retroperitoneal sarcomas: A comparative analysis of dosimetric and treatment delivery parameters.
Taggar AS; Graham D; Kurien E; Gräfe JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):276-281. PubMed ID: 29178585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noncoplanar VMAT for Brain Metastases: A Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Comparison With Coplanar VMAT, IMRT, and CyberKnife.
Zhang S; Yang R; Shi C; Li J; Zhuang H; Tian S; Wang J
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 18():1533033819871621. PubMed ID: 31451059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of a unified approach to intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volume-modulated arc therapy optimization and delivery.
Hoover DA; MacFarlane M; Wong E; Battista JJ; Chen JZ
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):726-34. PubMed ID: 25652486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Left breast irradiation with tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) versus tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy (t-VMAT): trade-offs between secondary cancer induction risk and optimal target coverage.
Karpf D; Sakka M; Metzger M; Grabenbauer GG
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Sep; 14(1):156. PubMed ID: 31477165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal VMAT Delivery for Elekta MLC Beam Modulator: A Study of Collimator Rotation for Head and Neck Planning.
Murtaza G; Mehmood S; Silvia Favretto M; Cora S
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2020 Jun; 51(2):289-298. PubMed ID: 32229103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A treatment planning study comparing Elekta VMAT and fixed field IMRT using the varian treatment planning system eclipse.
Peters S; Schiefer H; Plasswilm L
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():153. PubMed ID: 25011529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a mixed beam therapy for postmastectomy breast cancer patients: Bolus electron conformal therapy combined with intensity modulated photon radiotherapy and volumetric modulated photon arc therapy.
Zhang R; Heins D; Sanders M; Guo B; Hogstrom K
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2912-2924. PubMed ID: 29749075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
