197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38221600)
1. Initial damage and failure load of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Bömicke W; Boisserée P; Rammelsberg P; Rues S
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jan; 28(1):94. PubMed ID: 38221600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Thermomechanical and Static Loading on the Load to Fracture of Metal-Ceramic, Monolithic, and Veneered Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
Lopez-Suarez C; Tobar C; Sola-Ruiz MF; Pelaez J; Suarez MJ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 30548895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screw-retained ceramic-veneered/monolithic zirconia partial implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A 5 to 10-year retrospective study on survival and complications.
Zhang Y; Luo J; Di P; Chen B; Li J; Yu Z; Lin Y
J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 37302066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture Resistance and Failure Mode of Monolithic Zirconia, Veneered Zirconia, and Metal-Ceramic Full-Coverage Restorations: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
Almohammed SN; Dourado AM; Al Quran FA
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 38381987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical performance of zirconia-ceramic cantilever fixed partial dentures-Longitudinal nine-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study.
Bömicke W; Rammelsberg P; Zenthöfer A; Ohlmann B
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jul; 63(3):334-339. PubMed ID: 30803899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro comparison of the load-bearing capacity of ceramic and metal-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses in the posterior region.
Bömicke W; Waldecker M; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Rues S
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 28533015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.
López-Suárez C; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():97-104. PubMed ID: 29678585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.
Alhasanyah A; Vaidyanathan TK; Flinton RJ
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 23387466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized clinical trial comparing monolithic and veneered zirconia three-unit posterior fixed partial dentures in a complete digital flow: three-year follow-up.
Pontevedra P; Lopez-Suarez C; Rodriguez V; Pelaez J; Suarez MJ
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4327-4335. PubMed ID: 35142924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital workflow for monolithic and veneered zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures: A five-year prospective randomized clinical trial.
Pontevedra P; Lopez-Suarez C; Rodriguez V; Tobar C; Pelaez J; Suarez MJ
J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan; 68(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 36990752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Load-Bearing Capacity of Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated with Different Connector Designs and Embrasure Shaping Methods.
Bakitian F; Seweryniak P; Papia E; Larsson C; Vult von Steyern P
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 30478870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EAO Position Paper: Material Selection for Implant-Supported Restorations.
Pjetursson BE; Fehmer V; Sailer I
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 35230351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of ceramic crown design (translucent monolithic zirconia vs. bilayered) of implant-supported single crowns after mechanical cycling.
de Oliveira Limirio JPJ; Gomes JML; Santiago-Junior JF; Nagay BE; Pesqueira AA; Assunção WG; Alves-Rezende MCR; Pellizzer EP
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38665052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Alkharrat AR; Schmitter M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 29196948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
Vult von Steyern P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture Behavior of Minimally Invasive, Posterior, and Fixed Dental Prostheses Manufactured from Monolithic Zirconia.
Bömicke W; Rues S; Hlavacek V; Rammelsberg P; Schmitter M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016 Nov; 28(6):367-381. PubMed ID: 27562053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
