These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38222170)
1. Comparison of Time to Intubation of a Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Utilizing C-MAC® Versus GlideScope® Versus Macintosh Blade: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study. Rajagopal S; Gardner RN; Swanson E; Kim S; Sondekoppam R; Ueda K; Hanada S Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50523. PubMed ID: 38222170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Huang P; Zhou R; Lu Z; Hang Y; Wang S; Huang Z BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 May; 20(1):119. PubMed ID: 32434470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways. van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Airway Management in Disaster Response: A Manikin Study Comparing Direct and Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation by Prehospital Providers in Level C Personal Protective Equipment. Yousif S; Machan JT; Alaska Y; Suner S Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Aug; 32(4):352-356. PubMed ID: 28318455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of 3 Videolaryngoscopes for Double-Lumen Tube Intubation in Humans by Users With Mixed Experience: A Randomized Controlled Study. El-Tahan MR; Khidr AM; Gaarour IS; Alshadwi SA; Alghamdi TM; Al'ghamdi A J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Feb; 32(1):277-286. PubMed ID: 29056498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation. Hsu HT; Chou SH; Wu PJ; Tseng KY; Kuo YW; Chou CY; Cheng KI Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 22324297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning curve and performance in simulated difficult airway for the novel C-MAC® video-stylet and C-MAC® Macintosh video laryngoscope: A prospective randomized manikin trial. Pius J; Noppens RR PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242154. PubMed ID: 33211728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Glidescope Core, C-MAC Miller and conventional Miller laryngoscope for difficult airway management by anesthetists with limited and extensive experience in a simulated Pierre Robin sequence: A randomized crossover manikin study. Moritz A; Holzhauser L; Fuchte T; Kremer S; Schmidt J; Irouschek A PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250369. PubMed ID: 33886650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim. Wetsch WA; Carlitscheck M; Spelten O; Teschendorf P; Hellmich M; Genzwürker HV; Hinkelbein J Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 28(12):849-58. PubMed ID: 21986981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for intubation performed by novice physicians in a difficult airway scenario. Szarpak L; Smereka J; Ladny JR Am J Emerg Med; 2017 May; 35(5):796-797. PubMed ID: 28139309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer]. Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Randomized Comparison Simulating Face to Face Endotracheal Intubation of Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC Video Laryngoscope, Glidescope Video Laryngoscope, and Macintosh Laryngoscope. Choi HY; Oh YM; Kang GH; Kang H; Jang YS; Kim W; Kim E; Cho YS; Choi H; Kim H; Kim GY Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():961782. PubMed ID: 26161424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the glidescope, CMAC, storz DCI with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated difficult laryngoscopy: a manikin study. Healy DW; Picton P; Morris M; Turner C BMC Anesthesiol; 2012 Jun; 12():11. PubMed ID: 22720884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Cricoid Pressure on Laryngeal View During Macintosh, McGrath MAC X-Blade and GlideScope Video Laryngoscopies. Arslan Zİ; Solak M Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2017 Dec; 45(6):361-366. PubMed ID: 29359076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Direct laryngoscopy or C-MAC video laryngoscopy? Routine tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ENT surgery]. Meininger D; Strouhal U; Weber CF; Fogl D; Holzer L; Zacharowski K; Byhahn C Anaesthesist; 2010 Sep; 59(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 20703441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can the new McGrath laryngoscope rival the GlideScope Ranger portable video laryngoscope? A randomized manikin study. Kim W; Choi HJ; Lim T; Kang BS Am J Emerg Med; 2014 Oct; 32(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 25171799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. GlideScope versus C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Huang P; Qiu Y; Xu T; Sun X; Lu Z; Zhang Y; Yu J; Wu J; Su D; Huang Z J Clin Anesth; 2023 Dec; 91():111274. PubMed ID: 37801823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy and Videolaryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation by Inexperienced Users: A Pediatric Manikin Study. Balaban O; Hakim M; Walia H; Tumin D; Lind M; Tobias JD Pediatr Emerg Care; 2020 Apr; 36(4):169-172. PubMed ID: 28590998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors by video laryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Lee RA; van Zundert AA; Maassen RL; Wieringa PA Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Feb; 56(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 22091734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of dental force applied during endotracheal intubation with hyper-angulated and macintosh-type video laryngoscopy blades used by emergency medicine trainees: A randomized cross-over manikin study. Karabacak AR; Özturan İU; Şefoğlu ÖF; Doğan NÖ; Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Pekdemir M Turk J Emerg Med; 2024; 24(3):151-157. PubMed ID: 39108683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]