204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38222832)
1. Bone Substitute Options for Spine Fusion in Patients With Spine Trauma-Part I: Fusion Biology, Autografts, Allografts, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Ceramics.
Lee BJ; Seok MC; Koo HW; Jeong JH; Ko MJ
Korean J Neurotrauma; 2023 Dec; 19(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 38222832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.
Kadam A; Millhouse PW; Kepler CK; Radcliff KE; Fehlings MG; Janssen ME; Sasso RC; Benedict JJ; Vaccaro AR
Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():33. PubMed ID: 27909654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone Substitute Options for Spine Fusion in Patients With Spine Trauma-Part II: The Role of rhBMP.
Seok MC; Koo HW; Jeong JH; Ko MJ; Lee BJ
Korean J Neurotrauma; 2024 Mar; 20(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 38576507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion with a demineralized bone matrix gel.
Morone MA; Boden SD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jan; 23(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 9474720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes as an adjunct for lumbar fusion.
Kaiser MG; Groff MW; Watters WC; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Choudhri TF; Eck JC; Sharan A; Wang JC; Dhall SS; Resnick DK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):106-32. PubMed ID: 24980593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Efficacy of Commonly Available Human Bone Graft Substitutes as Tested for Posterolateral Fusion in an Athymic Rat Model.
Bhamb N; Kanim LEA; Drapeau S; Mohan S; Vasquez E; Shimko D; McKAY W; Bae HW
Int J Spine Surg; 2019 Oct; 13(5):437-458. PubMed ID: 31745449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current Updates on Bone Grafting Biomaterials and Recombinant Human Growth Factors Implanted Biotherapy for Spinal Fusion: A Review of Human Clinical Studies.
Li G; Li P; Chen Q; Thu HE; Hussain Z
Curr Drug Deliv; 2019; 16(2):94-110. PubMed ID: 30360738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion. A prospective multicenter study.
An HS; Simpson JM; Glover JM; Stephany J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Oct; 20(20):2211-6. PubMed ID: 8545714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review.
Gupta A; Kukkar N; Sharif K; Main BJ; Albers CE; El-Amin Iii SF
World J Orthop; 2015 Jul; 6(6):449-56. PubMed ID: 26191491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Healos/bone marrow to INFUSE(rhBMP-2/ACS) with a collagen-ceramic sponge bulking agent as graft substitutes for lumbar spine fusion.
Kraiwattanapong C; Boden SD; Louis-Ugbo J; Attallah E; Barnes B; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(9):1001-7; discussion 1007. PubMed ID: 15864149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP-2) in Spine Surgery Is It Valuable?
Fernandez L; Petrizzo A
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2023 Mar; 81(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 36821734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving the clinical evidence of bone graft substitute technology in lumbar spine surgery.
Hsu WK; Nickoli MS; Wang JC; Lieberman JR; An HS; Yoon ST; Youssef JA; Brodke DS; McCullough CM
Global Spine J; 2012 Dec; 2(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 24353975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Updates in the use of bone grafts in the lumbar spine.
Park JJ; Hershman SH; Kim YH
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 24032582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Demineralized Bone Matrix in Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Applications and Future Trends.
Shepard NA; Rush AJ; Scarborough NL; Carter AJ; Phillips FM
Int J Spine Surg; 2021 Apr; 15(s1):113-119. PubMed ID: 34376500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fusion Revision Surgery With Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator to Harvest Autograft After Spinal Pseudarthrosis.
Elhessy AH; Eltayeby HH; Kane SC; Garonzik IM; Conway JE; Conway JD
Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e27503. PubMed ID: 35949743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of osteoconductive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes.
Kurd M; Cohick S; Park A; Ahmadinia K; Lee J; An H
Eur Spine J; 2015 May; 24(5):1066-73. PubMed ID: 25371089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion.
D'Souza M; Macdonald NA; Gendreau JL; Duddleston PJ; Feng AY; Ho AL
Biomedicines; 2019 Sep; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 31561556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Autograft, Allograft, and Bone Graft Substitutes: Clinical Evidence and Indications for Use in the Setting of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.
Baldwin P; Li DJ; Auston DA; Mir HS; Yoon RS; Koval KJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Apr; 33(4):203-213. PubMed ID: 30633080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The choice between allograft or demineralized bone matrix is not unambiguous in trauma surgery.
Brink O
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52 Suppl 2():S23-S28. PubMed ID: 33189329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D-Printed Ceramic-Demineralized Bone Matrix Hyperelastic Bone Composite Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.
Driscoll JA; Lubbe R; Jakus AE; Chang K; Haleem M; Yun C; Singh G; Schneider AD; Katchko KM; Soriano C; Newton M; Maerz T; Li X; Baker K; Hsu WK; Shah RN; Stock SR; Hsu EL
Tissue Eng Part A; 2020 Feb; 26(3-4):157-166. PubMed ID: 31469055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
