BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38222832)

  • 1. Bone Substitute Options for Spine Fusion in Patients With Spine Trauma-Part I: Fusion Biology, Autografts, Allografts, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Ceramics.
    Lee BJ; Seok MC; Koo HW; Jeong JH; Ko MJ
    Korean J Neurotrauma; 2023 Dec; 19(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 38222832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.
    Kadam A; Millhouse PW; Kepler CK; Radcliff KE; Fehlings MG; Janssen ME; Sasso RC; Benedict JJ; Vaccaro AR
    Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():33. PubMed ID: 27909654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion with a demineralized bone matrix gel.
    Morone MA; Boden SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jan; 23(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 9474720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes as an adjunct for lumbar fusion.
    Kaiser MG; Groff MW; Watters WC; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Choudhri TF; Eck JC; Sharan A; Wang JC; Dhall SS; Resnick DK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):106-32. PubMed ID: 24980593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative Efficacy of Commonly Available Human Bone Graft Substitutes as Tested for Posterolateral Fusion in an Athymic Rat Model.
    Bhamb N; Kanim LEA; Drapeau S; Mohan S; Vasquez E; Shimko D; McKAY W; Bae HW
    Int J Spine Surg; 2019 Oct; 13(5):437-458. PubMed ID: 31745449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current Updates on Bone Grafting Biomaterials and Recombinant Human Growth Factors Implanted Biotherapy for Spinal Fusion: A Review of Human Clinical Studies.
    Li G; Li P; Chen Q; Thu HE; Hussain Z
    Curr Drug Deliv; 2019; 16(2):94-110. PubMed ID: 30360738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion. A prospective multicenter study.
    An HS; Simpson JM; Glover JM; Stephany J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Oct; 20(20):2211-6. PubMed ID: 8545714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review.
    Gupta A; Kukkar N; Sharif K; Main BJ; Albers CE; El-Amin Iii SF
    World J Orthop; 2015 Jul; 6(6):449-56. PubMed ID: 26191491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Healos/bone marrow to INFUSE(rhBMP-2/ACS) with a collagen-ceramic sponge bulking agent as graft substitutes for lumbar spine fusion.
    Kraiwattanapong C; Boden SD; Louis-Ugbo J; Attallah E; Barnes B; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(9):1001-7; discussion 1007. PubMed ID: 15864149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP-2) in Spine Surgery Is It Valuable?
    Fernandez L; Petrizzo A
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2023 Mar; 81(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 36821734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the clinical evidence of bone graft substitute technology in lumbar spine surgery.
    Hsu WK; Nickoli MS; Wang JC; Lieberman JR; An HS; Yoon ST; Youssef JA; Brodke DS; McCullough CM
    Global Spine J; 2012 Dec; 2(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 24353975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Updates in the use of bone grafts in the lumbar spine.
    Park JJ; Hershman SH; Kim YH
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 24032582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Demineralized Bone Matrix in Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Applications and Future Trends.
    Shepard NA; Rush AJ; Scarborough NL; Carter AJ; Phillips FM
    Int J Spine Surg; 2021 Apr; 15(s1):113-119. PubMed ID: 34376500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fusion Revision Surgery With Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator to Harvest Autograft After Spinal Pseudarthrosis.
    Elhessy AH; Eltayeby HH; Kane SC; Garonzik IM; Conway JE; Conway JD
    Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e27503. PubMed ID: 35949743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of osteoconductive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes.
    Kurd M; Cohick S; Park A; Ahmadinia K; Lee J; An H
    Eur Spine J; 2015 May; 24(5):1066-73. PubMed ID: 25371089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion.
    D'Souza M; Macdonald NA; Gendreau JL; Duddleston PJ; Feng AY; Ho AL
    Biomedicines; 2019 Sep; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 31561556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Autograft, Allograft, and Bone Graft Substitutes: Clinical Evidence and Indications for Use in the Setting of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.
    Baldwin P; Li DJ; Auston DA; Mir HS; Yoon RS; Koval KJ
    J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Apr; 33(4):203-213. PubMed ID: 30633080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The choice between allograft or demineralized bone matrix is not unambiguous in trauma surgery.
    Brink O
    Injury; 2021 Jun; 52 Suppl 2():S23-S28. PubMed ID: 33189329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3D-Printed Ceramic-Demineralized Bone Matrix Hyperelastic Bone Composite Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.
    Driscoll JA; Lubbe R; Jakus AE; Chang K; Haleem M; Yun C; Singh G; Schneider AD; Katchko KM; Soriano C; Newton M; Maerz T; Li X; Baker K; Hsu WK; Shah RN; Stock SR; Hsu EL
    Tissue Eng Part A; 2020 Feb; 26(3-4):157-166. PubMed ID: 31469055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Osteogenic protein-1 for long bone nonunion: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2005; 5(6):1-57. PubMed ID: 23074475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.