BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38223079)

  • 1. Low
    Yan L; Wang Z; Li D; Wang Y; Yang G; Zhao Y; Kong Y; Wang R; Wu R; Wang Z
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Jan; 14(1):111-122. PubMed ID: 38223079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of an artificial intelligence-based tool in [
    Sachpekidis C; Enqvist O; Ulén J; Kopp-Schneider A; Pan L; Jauch A; Hajiyianni M; John L; Weinhold N; Sauer S; Goldschmidt H; Edenbrandt L; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Oct; 50(12):3697-3708. PubMed ID: 37493665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Association Between Liver and Tumor [
    Wu X; Bhattarai A; Korkola P; Pertovaara H; Eskola H; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Oct; 19(5):787-794. PubMed ID: 28144908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consistency of metabolic tumor volume of non-small-cell lung cancer primary tumor measured using 18F-FDG PET/CT at two different tracer uptake times.
    Liu H; Chen P; Wroblewski K; Hou P; Zhang CP; Jiang Y; Pu Y
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jan; 37(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 26426969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
    Liao S; Penney BC; Wroblewski K; Zhang H; Simon CA; Kampalath R; Shih MC; Shimada N; Chen S; Salgia R; Appelbaum DE; Suzuki K; Chen CT; Pu Y
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jan; 39(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 21946983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Volume-based parameters on FDG PET may predict the proliferative potential of soft-tissue sarcomas.
    Kitao T; Shiga T; Hirata K; Sekizawa M; Takei T; Yamashiro K; Tamaki N
    Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 33(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 30196378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the prognostic value of different methods of calculating the tumour metabolic volume with
    Guzmán Ortiz S; Mucientes Rasilla J; Vargas Núñez JA; Royuela A; Navarro Matilla B; Mitjavila Casanovas M
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2020; 39(6):340-346. PubMed ID: 32646783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic role of baseline
    Albano D; Bosio G; Camoni L; Farina M; Re A; Tucci A; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
    Hematol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30299563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metabolic Tumor Burden Assessed by Dual Time Point [
    Garcia-Vicente AM; Pérez-Beteta J; Pérez-García VM; Molina D; Jiménez-Londoño GA; Soriano-Castrejón A; Martínez-González A
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Aug; 19(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 27981471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional Parameters of
    Yang J; Zhu S; Pang F; Xu M; Dong Y; Hao J; Ma X
    Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():8659826. PubMed ID: 30363729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interobserver Agreement on Automated Metabolic Tumor Volume Measurements of Deauville Score 4 and 5 Lesions at Interim
    Zwezerijnen GJC; Eertink JJ; Burggraaff CN; Wiegers SE; Shaban EAIN; Pieplenbosch S; Oprea-Lager DE; Lugtenburg PJ; Hoekstra OS; de Vet HCW; Zijlstra JM; Boellaard R
    J Nucl Med; 2021 Nov; 62(11):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 33674403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value on F18-FDG PET/CT in patients with extranodal nasal type NK/T cell lymphoma: A multicenter, retrospective analysis.
    Pak K; Kim BS; Kim K; Kim IJ; Jun S; Jeong YJ; Shim HK; Kim SD; Cho KS
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 29056243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are lesion features reproducible between
    Constantino CS; Oliveira FPM; Silva M; Oliveira C; Castanheira JC; Silva Â; Vaz SC; Vieira P; Costa DC
    Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):3071-3079. PubMed ID: 33125562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
    Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    Zhou W; Wen J; Hua F; Xu W; Lu X; Yin B; Geng D; Guan Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():26-32. PubMed ID: 29857862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deep learning generation of preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) images from low-count PET with task-based performance assessment.
    Dutta K; Laforest R; Luo J; Jha AK; Shoghi KI
    Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 51(6):4324-4339. PubMed ID: 38710222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of
    Mayoral M; Paredes P; Saco A; Fusté P; Perlaza P; Tapias A; Fernandez-Martinez A; Vidal L; Ordi J; Pavia J; Martinez-Roman S; Lomeña F
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2018; 37(2):80-86. PubMed ID: 28869177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value on SUV-derived parameters assessed on
    Liao X; Liu M; Li S; Huang W; Guo C; Liu J; Xiong Y; Zhang J; Fan Y; Wang R
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):49. PubMed ID: 37020286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.