123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38224619)
21. Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Chen W; Unkelbach J; Trofimov A; Madden T; Kooy H; Bortfeld T; Craft D
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):591-608. PubMed ID: 22222720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach.
Yang Z; Li H; Li Y; Li Y; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Sahoo N; Poenisch F; Gillin M; Zhu XR; Zhang X
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jul; 14(1):129. PubMed ID: 31324257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive optimization method to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers.
Yang Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Zhu XR; Gunn B; Frank SJ; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Liao L; Li Y; Chen M; Li H
Radiother Oncol; 2020 Jan; 142():124-132. PubMed ID: 31564553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Li H; Zhang X; Sahoo N; Wu RY; Li X; Lee AK; Chang EL; Choi S; Pugh T; Frank SJ; Gillin MT; Mahajan A; Grosshans DR
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Sep; 9():202. PubMed ID: 25212571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Cao W; Lim G; Liao L; Li Y; Jiang S; Li X; Li H; Suzuki K; Zhu XR; Gomez D; Zhang X
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(21):6341-54. PubMed ID: 25295881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multicriteria optimization enables less experienced planners to efficiently produce high quality treatment plans in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
Kierkels RG; Visser R; Bijl HP; Langendijk JA; van 't Veld AA; Steenbakkers RJ; Korevaar EW
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():87. PubMed ID: 25885444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spot-Scanning Proton Arc (SPArc) Therapy: The First Robust and Delivery-Efficient Spot-Scanning Proton Arc Therapy.
Ding X; Li X; Zhang JM; Kabolizadeh P; Stevens C; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Dec; 96(5):1107-1116. PubMed ID: 27869083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of common dental fixtures on treatment planning and delivery for head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy.
Hu YH; Seum WCTH; Hunzeker A; Muller O; Foote RL; Mundy DW
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13973. PubMed ID: 36972299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.
Liu C; Schild SE; Chang JY; Liao Z; Korte S; Shen J; Ding X; Hu Y; Kang Y; Keole SR; Sio TT; Wong WW; Sahoo N; Bues M; Liu W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jun; 101(2):479-489. PubMed ID: 29550033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multicriteria optimization informed VMAT planning.
Chen H; Craft DL; Gierga DP
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 24360919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential.
Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Craft D; Niemierko A; Trofimov A; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 23790771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improving knowledge-based treatment planning for lung cancer radiotherapy with automatic multi-criteria optimized training plans.
Fjellanger K; Hordnes M; Sandvik IM; Sulen TH; Heijmen BJM; Breedveld S; Rossi L; Pettersen HES; Hysing LB
Acta Oncol; 2023 Oct; 62(10):1194-1200. PubMed ID: 37589124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A novel energy layer optimization framework for spot-scanning proton arc therapy.
Gu W; Ruan D; Lyu Q; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2072-2084. PubMed ID: 32040214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robust beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Gu W; Neph R; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3356-3370. PubMed ID: 31169917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniques.
Liu W; Li Y; Li X; Cao W; Zhang X
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3089-101. PubMed ID: 22755694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinically Applicable Monte Carlo-based Biological Dose Optimization for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers With Spot-Scanning Proton Therapy.
Wan Chan Tseung HS; Ma J; Kreofsky CR; Ma DJ; Beltran C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Aug; 95(5):1535-1543. PubMed ID: 27325476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning.
Newpower MA; Chiang BH; Ahmad S; Chen Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 May; 24(5):e13911. PubMed ID: 36748663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
