124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38224850)
1. Repositioning accuracy of the implant- and abutment-level prosthetic components used in conventional and digital workflows.
Rutkūnas V; Bilius V; Dirsė J; Revilla-León M; Rimašauskas M; Zadrożny Ł; Trumpaitė-Vanagienė R
J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104835. PubMed ID: 38224850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
Lee JH; Kim DG; Park CJ; Cho LR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e83-9. PubMed ID: 23088616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Influence of a Positioning Hex on Abutment Rotation in Tapered Internal Implants: A 3D Finite Element Model Study.
Hyun DG; Kwon HB; Lim YJ; Koak JY; Kim MJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):281-288. PubMed ID: 32142564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque.
Dailey B; Jordan L; Blind O; Tavernier B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 19492640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Displacement and performance of abutments in narrow-diameter implants with different internal connections.
Jacobs N; Seghi R; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 33413986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.
Siadat H; Beyabanaki E; Mousavi N; Alikhasi M
J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):271-277. PubMed ID: 28874994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atraumatic intraoral scans and virtual hybrid casts for custom implant abutments and zirconia implants: Accuracy of the workflow.
Schubert O; Edelhoff D; Schweiger J; Güth JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):920-929. PubMed ID: 34598772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional positional accuracy of intraoral and laboratory implant scan bodies.
Tan JZH; Tan MY; See Toh YL; Wong KY; Tan KBC
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):735-744. PubMed ID: 33836856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of precision of fit, rotational freedom, and torque loss with copy-milled zirconia and prefabricated titanium abutments.
Alikhasi M; Monzavi A; Bassir SH; Naini RB; Khosronedjad N; Keshavarz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(4):996-1002. PubMed ID: 23869357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the effect of the protector cap for castable implant abutments on reverse tightening values.
Alfaifi MA; Wadhwani C; Schwedhelm ER; Kattadiyil MT
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):476.e1-476.e7. PubMed ID: 36402626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading.
Queiroz DA; Hagee N; Lee DJ; Zheng F
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 31810616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Abutment Cooling on Reverse Torque Values of Abutment Screws: An In Vitro Study.
Srimurugan-Thayanithi N; Abou-Ayash S; Yilmaz B; Schimmel M; Brägger U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 37099583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-Dimensional Displacement of Nine Different Abutments for an Implant with an Internal Hexagon Platform.
Gilbert AB; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL; Chien HH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):781-8. PubMed ID: 26252029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Fit and Stability Between 3D-Printed and Milled Implant Abutments with Titanium-6Al-4V and Co-Cr Metal Alloys.
Yoo SY; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Park JM; Chung SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Oct; 38(5):1014-1024. PubMed ID: 37847843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abutment rotational freedom on five implant systems with different internal connections.
Bédouin Y; Lefrançois E; Salomon JP; Auroy P
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):433-439. PubMed ID: 34238536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 2: Screw resistance test.
Rutkunas V; Dirse J; Kules D; Mischitz I; Larsson C; Janda M
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):262-271. PubMed ID: 35981927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant and abutment level impression techniques: effect on marginal discrepancy.
Alikhasi M; Siadat H; Monzavi A; Momen-Heravi F
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 20594060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
