These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38227008)

  • 1. A touching advantage: cross-modal stop-signals improve reactive response inhibition.
    Friehs MA; Schmalbrock P; Merz S; Dechant M; Hartwigsen G; Frings C
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Mar; 242(3):599-618. PubMed ID: 38227008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stopping Speed in Response to Auditory and Visual Stop Signals Depends on Go Signal Modality.
    Weber S; Salomoni SE; St George RJ; Hinder MR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 36(7):1395-1411. PubMed ID: 38683725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common and Unique Inhibitory Control Signatures of Action-Stopping and Attentional Capture Suggest That Actions Are Stopped in Two Stages.
    Tatz JR; Soh C; Wessel JR
    J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(42):8826-8838. PubMed ID: 34493541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proactive and reactive stopping when distracted: an attentional account.
    Verbruggen F; Stevens T; Chambers CD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1295-300. PubMed ID: 24842070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task.
    Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Hirose S; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 29(50):15870-7. PubMed ID: 20016103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stop signals delay synchrony more for finger tapping than vocalization: a dual modality study of rhythmic synchronization in the stop signal task.
    Castro-Meneses LJ; Sowman PF
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5242. PubMed ID: 30013856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural Architecture of Selective Stopping Strategies: Distinct Brain Activity Patterns Are Associated with Attentional Capture But Not with Outright Stopping.
    Sebastian A; Rössler K; Wibral M; Mobascher A; Lieb K; Jung P; Tüscher O
    J Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 37(40):9785-9794. PubMed ID: 28887387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. OSARI, an Open-Source Anticipated Response Inhibition Task.
    He JL; Hirst RJ; Puri R; Coxon J; Byblow W; Hinder M; Skippen P; Matzke D; Heathcote A; Wadsley CG; Silk T; Hyde C; Parmar D; Pedapati E; Gilbert DL; Huddleston DA; Mostofsky S; Leunissen I; MacDonald HJ; Chowdhury NS; Gretton M; Nikitenko T; Zandbelt B; Strickland L; Puts NAJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1530-1540. PubMed ID: 34751923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proactive cues facilitate faster action reprogramming, but not stopping, in a response-selective stop signal task.
    Salomoni SE; Gronau QF; Heathcote A; Matzke D; Hinder MR
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):19564. PubMed ID: 37949974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional spatial cueing of the stop-signal affects the ability to suppress behavioural responses.
    Haque MT; Segreti M; Giuffrida V; Ferraina S; Brunamonti E; Pani P
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Jun; 242(6):1429-1438. PubMed ID: 38652274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies.
    Best M; Lawrence NS; Logan GD; McLaren IP; Verbruggen F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):115-37. PubMed ID: 26322688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):835-54. PubMed ID: 19485695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incentives and voluntary stopping: The intentional hand task.
    Weidacker K; Kvamme TL; Whiteford S; Valle Guzman N; Voon V
    Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104504. PubMed ID: 33161198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stop-signal delay reflects response selection duration in stop-signal task.
    Aksiotis V; Myachykov A; Tumyalis A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):1976-1989. PubMed ID: 37415061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Balancing cognitive demands: control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Bissett PG; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):392-404. PubMed ID: 21171806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual salience of the stop-signal affects movement suppression process.
    Montanari R; Giamundo M; Brunamonti E; Ferraina S; Pani P
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 235(7):2203-2214. PubMed ID: 28439628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.
    Dutra IC; Waller DA; Wessel JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(6):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 29305533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ADHD and behavioral inhibition: a re-examination of the stop-signal task.
    Alderson RM; Rapport MD; Sarver DE; Kofler MJ
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 2008 Oct; 36(7):989-98. PubMed ID: 18461439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resisting distraction and response inhibition trigger similar enhancements of future performance.
    Bissett PG; Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():40-51. PubMed ID: 28843207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.