166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38227687)
1. Impact of Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification on the Diagnostic Performance of PET-Based Perfusion Scans Using
Rasmussen LD; Gormsen LC; Ejlersen JA; Karim SR; Westra J; Knudsen LL; Kirk J; Søndergaard HM; Mortensen J; Knuuti J; Christiansen EH; Eftekhari A; Bøttcher M; Winther S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jan; 17(1):e016138. PubMed ID: 38227687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Myocardial Blood Flow by Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Suspected Coronary Stenosis: Comparison to PET and Invasive Physiology.
Rasmussen LD; Murphy T; Milidonis X; Eftekhari A; Karim SR; Westra J; Dahl JN; Isaksen C; Brix L; Ejlersen JA; Nyegaard M; Johansen JK; Søndergaard HM; Mortensen J; Gormsen LC; Christiansen EH; Chiribiri A; Petersen SE; Bøttcher M; Winther S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jun; 17(6):e016635. PubMed ID: 38889213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging.
Danad I; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Heymans MW; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; James S; Sörensen J; Knaapen P; Knuuti J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 64(14):1464-75. PubMed ID: 25277618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET.
Rasmussen LD; Winther S; Eftekhari A; Karim SR; Westra J; Isaksen C; Brix L; Ejlersen JA; Murphy T; Milidonis X; Nyegaard M; Benovoy M; Johansen JK; Søndergaard HM; Hammid O; Mortensen J; Knudsen LL; Gormsen LC; Christiansen EH; Chiribiri A; Petersen SE; Böttcher M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 May; 16(5):642-655. PubMed ID: 36881421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fully automated pixel-wise quantitative CMR-myocardial perfusion with CMR-coronary angiography to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Zhao SH; Guo WF; Yao ZF; Yang S; Yun H; Chen YY; Han TT; Zhou XY; Fu CX; Zeng MS; Li CG; Pan CZ; Jin H
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7238-7249. PubMed ID: 37145148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Diagnostics Improve Detection of Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis by 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography.
Lee JM; Kim CH; Koo BK; Hwang D; Park J; Zhang J; Tong Y; Jeon KH; Bang JI; Suh M; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Na SH; Ahn JM; Park SJ; Kim HS
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 27609817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs
Williams MC; Mirsadraee S; Dweck MR; Weir NW; Fletcher A; Lucatelli C; MacGillivray T; Golay SK; Cruden NL; Henriksen PA; Uren N; McKillop G; Lima JA; Reid JH; van Beek EJ; Patel D; Newby DE
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 27334015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrated myocardial flow reserve (iMFR) assessment: optimized PET blood flow quantification for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Poitrasson-Rivière A; Moody JB; Renaud JM; Hagio T; Arida-Moody L; Buckley CJ; Al-Mallah MH; Nallamothu BK; Weinberg RL; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Dec; 51(1):136-146. PubMed ID: 37807004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absolute flow or myocardial flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease?
Joutsiniemi E; Saraste A; Pietilä M; Mäki M; Kajander S; Ukkonen H; Airaksinen J; Knuuti J
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 15(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 24408930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic value of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment by NaI(Tl) SPECT in detecting significant stenosis: a prospective, multi-center study.
Wang L; Zheng Y; Zhang J; Wang M; Wu D; Wang Y; Qiu H; Hsu B; Fang W
J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Apr; 30(2):769-780. PubMed ID: 35971031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coronary artery stenosis-related perfusion ratio using dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: a pilot for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Kuwahara N; Tanabe Y; Kido T; Kurata A; Uetani T; Ochi H; Kawaguchi N; Kido T; Ikeda S; Yamaguchi O; Asano M; Mochizuki T
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2020 Oct; 35(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 31630340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine Learning From Quantitative Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Fractional Flow Reserve-Defined Ischemia and Impaired Myocardial Blood Flow.
Lin A; van Diemen PA; Motwani M; McElhinney P; Otaki Y; Han D; Kwan A; Tzolos E; Klein E; Kuronuma K; Grodecki K; Shou B; Rios R; Manral N; Cadet S; Danad I; Driessen RS; Berman DS; Nørgaard BL; Slomka PJ; Knaapen P; Dey D
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Oct; 15(10):e014369. PubMed ID: 36252116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated Motion Correction for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements and Diagnostic Performance of
Kuronuma K; Wei CC; Singh A; Lemley M; Hayes SW; Otaki Y; Hyun MC; Van Kriekinge SD; Kavanagh P; Huang C; Han D; Dey D; Berman DS; Slomka PJ
J Nucl Med; 2024 Jan; 65(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 38050106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of quantitative, semi-quantitative, and visual analysis of dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: a validation study with invasive fractional flow reserve.
Li Y; Dai X; Lu Z; Shen C; Zhang J
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):525-534. PubMed ID: 32794126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring Coronary Circulatory Response to Stenosis and Its Association With Invasive Physiologic Indexes Using Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Pressure.
Lee JM; Hwang D; Park J; Zhang J; Tong Y; Kim CH; Bang JI; Suh M; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Koo BK
Circulation; 2017 Nov; 136(19):1798-1808. PubMed ID: 28851731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemodynamic Insights into Combined Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Assessment Through Quantitative [
de Winter RW; van Diemen PA; Schumacher SP; Jukema RA; Somsen YBO; Hoek R; van Rossum AC; Twisk JWR; de Waard GA; Nap A; Raijmakers PG; Driessen RS; Knaapen P; Danad I
J Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 65(2):279-286. PubMed ID: 38176722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by
Zampella E; Acampa W; Assante R; Nappi C; Gaudieri V; Mainolfi CG; Green R; Cantoni V; Panico M; Klain M; Petretta M; Slomka PJ; Cuocolo A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):521-529. PubMed ID: 29372272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic value of quantitative coronary flow reserve and myocardial blood flow estimated by dynamic 320 MDCT scanning in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease.
Obara M; Naya M; Oyama-Manabe N; Aikawa T; Tomiyama Y; Sasaki T; Kikuchi Y; Manabe O; Katoh C; Tamaki N; Tsutsui H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(27):e11354. PubMed ID: 29979416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fractal Analysis of Dynamic Stress CT-Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Hemodynamically Relevant Coronary Artery Disease.
Michallek F; Nakamura S; Kurita T; Ota H; Nishimiya K; Ogawa R; Shizuka T; Nakashima H; Wang Y; Ito T; Sakuma H; Dewey M; Kitagawa K
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Sep; 15(9):1591-1601. PubMed ID: 36075619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
