118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38229450)
1. Influence of internal angle and shape of the lining on residual stress of Class II molar restorations.
Zuo Q; Li A; Teng H; Liu Z
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Apr; 27(5):680-688. PubMed ID: 38229450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of the lining material, thickness and coverage on residual stress of class II molar restorations by multilayer technique.
Sun T; Shao B; Liu Z
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Apr; 202():105995. PubMed ID: 33592326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A
Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Direct and Indirect Materials on Stress Distribution in Class II MOD Restorations: A 3D-Finite Element Analysis Study.
Alp Ş; Gulec Alagoz L; Ulusoy N
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7435054. PubMed ID: 33381580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello PP; Ciaramella S; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Borges AL; Tribst JP; Dal Piva A; Garcia-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 31094138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of dental restoration depth, internal cavity angle, and material properties on biomechanical resistance of a treated molar tooth.
Babaei B; Cella S; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105305. PubMed ID: 35700676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal integrity in minimally invasive molar resin composite restorations: Impact of polymerization shrinkage.
Weimann D; Fleck C; Razi H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Jul; 155():106554. PubMed ID: 38676971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shrinkage stress and cuspal deflection in MOD restorations: analytical solutions and design guidelines.
Aregawi WA; Fok ASL
Dent Mater; 2021 May; 37(5):783-795. PubMed ID: 33612308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adhesive class I restorations in sound molar teeth incorporating combined resin-composite and glass ionomer materials: CAD-FE modeling and analysis.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Di Rienzo A; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 31395448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low and high viscosity bulk-fill composite resins stress distribution in primary molar tooth inlay cavity.
Guler MS
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Mar; 27(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 37216569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study.
Kowalczyk P
Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of minimally invasive endodontic access cavities and bonding status of resin composites on the mechanical property of endodontically-treated teeth: A finite element study.
Lin F; Ordinola-Zapata R; Fok ASL; Lee R
Dent Mater; 2022 Feb; 38(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 34930622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of thermal and thermomechanical stimuli on a molar tooth treated with resin-based restorative dental composites.
Thadathil Varghese J; Babaei B; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):811-823. PubMed ID: 35450702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of stresses during the polymerization shrinkage of self-curing resin cement in indirect restorations: a finite-element study.
Cornacchia TM; Silva GC; Magalhaes CS; Moreira AN; Las Casas EB
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):755-7. PubMed ID: 25728108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The finite element analysis of stress distribution in different size of MO cavities restored with composite resin inlays].
Zhang L; Lu Y; Yang BS; Guo Y; Li FP
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Apr; 24(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 25938145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
