BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38229450)

  • 21. Multi-response optimisation analysis of material properties in dental restorative composites under the influence of thermal and thermomechanical stimuli - A 3D finite element study.
    Thadathil Varghese J; Islam F; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106363. PubMed ID: 38169207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of cavosurface angle on the stress concentration and gaps formation in class V resin composite restorations.
    Correia AMO; Pereira VEM; Bresciani E; Platt JA; Borges ALS; Caneppele TMF
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Sep; 97():272-277. PubMed ID: 31136923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites.
    Ausiello P; Apicella A; Davidson CL; Rengo S
    J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1269-77. PubMed ID: 11522306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations?
    Novaes JB; Talma E; Las Casas EB; Aregawi W; Kolstad LW; Mantell S; Wang Y; Fok A
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 29199007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Finite element analysis of thermal stress distribution in different restorative materials used in class V cavities.
    Guler MS; Guler C; Cakici F; Cakici EB; Sen S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 26755215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Effects of Cavity Preparation and Composite Resin on Bond Strength and Stress Distribution Using the Microtensile Bond Test.
    Braga S; Oliveira L; Rodrigues RB; Bicalho AA; Novais VR; Armstrong S; Soares CJ
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 28976839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of temperature and humidity on post-gel shrinkage, cusp deformation, bond strength and shrinkage stress - Construction of a chamber to simulate the oral environment.
    Bicalho AA; de Souza SJ; de Rosatto CM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1523-32. PubMed ID: 26518338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Molar cusp deformation evaluated by micro-CT and enamel crack formation to compare incremental and bulk-filling techniques.
    Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Bicalho AA; Ribeiro MTH; Price RB; Soares CJ
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74():71-78. PubMed ID: 29689293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biomechanical performance of resin composite on dental tissue restoration: A finite element analysis.
    Ouldyerou A; Mehboob H; Mehboob A; Merdji A; Aminallah L; Mukdadi OM; Barsoum I; Junaedi H
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295582. PubMed ID: 38128035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stress relieving behaviour of flowable composite liners: A finite element analysis.
    Anatavara S; Sitthiseripratip K; Senawongse P
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 27251991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Heat Transfer and Thermal Stress Analysis of a Mandibular Molar Tooth Restored by Different Indirect Restorations Using a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method.
    Çelik Köycü B; İmirzalıoğlu P
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jul; 26(5):460-473. PubMed ID: 26618930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration.
    Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 15134943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatially resolved assessments of composite shrinkage in MOD restorations using a digital-image-correlation technique.
    Chuang SF; Chang CH; Chen TY
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 20951420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Substantial regional differences in the biomechanical behavior of molar treated with selective caries tissue removal technique: a finite element study.
    Weimann D; Morgenthal A; Schwendicke F; Fleck C; Razi H
    Dent Mater; 2021 Mar; 37(3):e162-e175. PubMed ID: 33358015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration.
    Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 15134941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.
    Kantardzić I; Vasiljević D; Blazić L; Luzanin O
    Croat Med J; 2012 Dec; 53(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 23275322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
    Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of fiber nets, application techniques and flowable composites on microleakage and the effect of fiber nets on polymerization shrinkage in class II MOD cavities.
    Ozel E; Soyman M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19363973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.