118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38229450)
41. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Contraction behaviors of dental composite restorations--finite element investigation with DIC validation.
Chuang SF; Chang CH; Chen TY
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):2138-49. PubMed ID: 22098914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Residual polymerization stresses in human premolars generated with Class II composite restorations.
Ohmori K; Tasaki T; Kimura S; Hori A; Sakaeda N; Hanabusa M; Yamamoto T
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Apr; 104():103643. PubMed ID: 32174402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Impact of quantity of resin, C-factor, and geometry on resin composite polymerization shrinkage stress in Class V restorations.
Borges AL; Borges AB; Xavier TA; Bottino MC; Platt JA
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 23786611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of Restorative Protocol on Cuspal Strain and Residual Stress in Endodontically Treated Molars.
Pereira R; Bicalho AA; Franco SD; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 26237644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Shrinkage behaviors of dental composite restorations-The experimental-numerical hybrid analysis.
Chuang SF; Huang PS; Chen TY; Huang LH; Su KC; Chang CH
Dent Mater; 2016 Dec; 32(12):e362-e373. PubMed ID: 27671469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations.
Arola D; Galles LA; Sarubin MF
J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 11137640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. An acoustic emission study on interfacial debonding in composite restorations.
Liu X; Li H; Li J; Lu P; Fok AS
Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):934-41. PubMed ID: 21700327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of different endodontic access preparations on the biomechanical behavior of lithium disilicate and resin nanoceramic onlay restorations: An in vitro and 3D finite element analysis study.
Lai H; Lin X; Zhang Y; Gong Q; Tong Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 35216818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Fatigue Performance and Stress Distribution of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Direct Bulk-fill Resin Composites.
Chen D; Chen Y; Pan Y; Ding H; Chen Q; Meng X
J Adhes Dent; 2021; 23(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 33512117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Incremental filling technique and composite material--part II: shrinkage and shrinkage stresses.
Bicalho AA; Valdívia AD; Barreto BC; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(2):E83-92. PubMed ID: 24125075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations--a 3D finite element analysis.
Ausiello P; Apicella A; Davidson CL
Dent Mater; 2002 Jun; 18(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 11992906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of Internal Adaptation in Class II Bulk-fill Composite Restorations Using Micro-CT.
Han SH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 27892836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Efficacy of flowable composite resin as stress-absorbing liners in Class I cavity restorations].
Zhao XY; Zhang WY; Li SB; Li YP; Gong X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 48(11):664-8. PubMed ID: 24513071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Experimental and FE displacement and polymerization stress of bonded restorations as a function of the C-Factor, volume and substrate stiffness.
Boaro LC; Brandt WC; Meira JB; Rodrigues FP; Palin WM; Braga RR
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 24296164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Simulating the shrinkage-induced interfacial damage around Class I composite resin restorations with damage mechanics.
Tseng PC; Chuang SF; Kaisarly D; Kunzelmann KH
Dent Mater; 2023 May; 39(5):513-521. PubMed ID: 37031095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations.
Sengul F; Gurbuz T; Sengul S
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25306152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
