These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38229450)

  • 61. Polymerization shrinkage of different types of composite resins and microleakage with and without liner in class II cavities.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 24147747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Influence of the restorative procedure factors on stress values in premolar with MOD cavity: a finite element study.
    Kantardžić I; Vasiljević D; Lužanin O; Maravić T; Blažić L
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Oct; 56(10):1875-1886. PubMed ID: 29633113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The effect of dental restoration geometry and material properties on biomechanical behaviour of a treated molar tooth: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Babaei B; Shouha P; Birman V; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jan; 125():104892. PubMed ID: 34688146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effect of two different types of fibers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with composite resin.
    Khan SI; Anupama R; Deepalakshmi M; Kumar KS
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Apr; 15(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 23534017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Stress on class tunnel restorations of the first mandibular molar].
    Tao L; Xu X; Ning F
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 16(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 17377703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Restorative material and loading type influence on the biomechanical behavior of wedge shaped cervical lesions.
    Pereira FA; Zeola LF; de Almeida Milito G; Reis BR; Pereira RD; Soares PV
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Apr; 20(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 26159778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
    Jung JH; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Finite Element Analysis of the Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars restored with Composite Resin along with Glass Fiber Insertion in Various Positions.
    Navimipour EJ; Firouzmandi M; Mirhashemi FS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 26067731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different cavity design and CAD-CAM materials under a static and vertical load: A finite element analysis.
    Abtahi S; Alikhasi M; Siadat H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):600.e1-600.e8. PubMed ID: 35016795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Finite element analysis of bonded model Class I 'restorations' after shrinkage.
    Rodrigues FP; Silikas N; Watts DC; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 22036589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Measurement of the internal adaptation of resin composites using micro-CT and its correlation with polymerization shrinkage.
    Kim HJ; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(2):E57-70. PubMed ID: 24111809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A mathematical analysis of shrinkage stress development in dental composite restorations during resin polymerization.
    Li J; Li H; Fok SL
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 18191446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Holographic detection of a tooth structure deformation after dental filling polymerization.
    Pantelić D; Blazić L; Savić-Sević S; Panić B
    J Biomed Opt; 2007; 12(2):024026. PubMed ID: 17477741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Biomechanical behavior and Weibull survival of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different marginal designs: A 3D finite element analysis.
    AboElhassan RG; Watts DC; Alamoush RA; Elraggal A
    Dent Mater; 2024 Feb; 40(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 37977990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Post-gel and Total Shrinkage Stress of Conventional and Bulk-fill Resin Composites in Endodontically-treated Molars.
    da Silva Pereira RA; de Bragança GF; Vilela A; de Deus RA; Miranda RR; Veríssimo C; Soares CJ
    Oper Dent; 2020 Sep; 45(5):E217-E226. PubMed ID: 32352352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Enhancing the mechanical stability of restored teeth with interfacial cracks: Finite element analysis.
    Babaei B; Prusty BG
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106191. PubMed ID: 37847958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Influence of the indirect restoration design on the fracture resistance: a finite element study.
    Mei ML; Chen YM; Li H; Chu CH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Jan; 15(1):3. PubMed ID: 26758615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A comparative evaluation of gingival microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restoration with two different lining techniques: An
    Shishodia R; Goyal V; Shaikh A; Mahule A; Dondani J
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 35439886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
    Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.