These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38229854)

  • 1. Comparison of Chemical Composition, Quality, and Muscle Fiber Characteristics between Cull Sows and Commercial Pigs: The Relationship between Pork Quality Based on Muscle Fiber Characteristics.
    Eom JU; Seo JK; Y KJ; Song S; Kim GD; Yang HS
    Food Sci Anim Resour; 2024 Jan; 44(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 38229854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality characteristics, fatty acid profiles, flavor compounds and eating quality of cull sow meat in comparison with commercial pork.
    Hoa VB; Cho SH; Seong PN; Kang SM; Kim YS; Moon SS; Choi YM; Kim JH; Seol KH
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 33(4):640-650. PubMed ID: 31480159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meat quality attributes and oxidation stability of loin chops from finishing gilts and cull sows.
    Song DH; Hwang YJ; Ham YK; Ha JH; Kim YR; Kim HW
    J Food Sci Technol; 2020 Aug; 57(8):3142-3150. PubMed ID: 32624615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pork quality traits and associated muscle metabolic changes in pigs under chronic prenatal and postnatal heat stress.
    Lebret B; Serviento AM; Renaudeau D
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37708312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased sow nutrition during midgestation affects muscle fiber development and meat quality, with no consequences on growth performance.
    Cerisuelo A; Baucells MD; Gasa J; Coma J; Carrión D; Chapinal N; Sala R
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Feb; 87(2):729-39. PubMed ID: 18952720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between pork quality and characteristics of muscle fibers classified by the distribution of myosin heavy chain isoforms.
    Kim GD; Ryu YC; Jeong JY; Yang HS; Joo ST
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5525-34. PubMed ID: 23989883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of fasting and transportation on pork quality development and extent of postmortem metabolism.
    Leheska JM; Wulf DM; Maddock RJ
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Dec; 80(12):3194-202. PubMed ID: 12542160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Physicochemical Properties between Standard and Sow Pork.
    Kim GW; Kim HY
    Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour; 2018 Oct; 38(5):1120-1130. PubMed ID: 30479517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increased maternal nutrition of sows has no beneficial effects on muscle fiber number or postnatal growth and has no impact on the meat quality of the offspring.
    Nissen PM; Danielsen VO; Jorgensen PF; Oksbjerg N
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Dec; 81(12):3018-27. PubMed ID: 14677857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between water-holding capacity and intramuscular fat content in Japanese commercial pork loin.
    Watanabe G; Motoyama M; Nakajima I; Sasaki K
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 31(6):914-918. PubMed ID: 29268572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlations of trained panel sensory values of cooked pork with fatty acid composition, muscle fiber type, and pork quality characteristics in Berkshire pigs.
    Jeong DW; Choi YM; Lee SH; Choe JH; Hong KC; Park HC; Kim BC
    Meat Sci; 2010 Nov; 86(3):607-15. PubMed ID: 20659787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preslaughter stress and muscle energy largely determine pork quality at two commercial processing plants.
    Hambrecht E; Eissen JJ; Nooijent RI; Ducro BJ; Smits CH; den Hartog LA; Verstegen MW
    J Anim Sci; 2004 May; 82(5):1401-9. PubMed ID: 15144080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between Berkshire and crossbreed on meat quality, and investigation of the relationship with fatty acid composition and meat quality.
    Seo JK; Eom JU; Yang HS
    J Anim Sci Technol; 2023 Sep; 65(5):1081-1093. PubMed ID: 37969337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dietary 25(OH)D3 supplementation to gestating and lactating sows and their progeny affects growth performance, carcass characteristics, blood profiles and myogenic regulatory factor-related gene expression in wean-finish pigs.
    Upadhaya SD; Chung TK; Jung YJ; Kim IH
    Anim Biosci; 2022 Mar; 35(3):461-474. PubMed ID: 34727644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of production system in local and conventional pig breeds on stress indicators at slaughter, muscle and meat traits and pork eating quality.
    Lebret B; Ecolan P; Bonhomme N; Méteau K; Prunier A
    Animal; 2015 Aug; 9(8):1404-13. PubMed ID: 25908582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Muscle Fiber Characteristics on Chop Surface of Pork Loin (M.
    Song S; Cheng H; Jung EY; Joo ST; Kim GD
    Food Sci Anim Resour; 2020 Nov; 40(6):957-968. PubMed ID: 33305280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of muscle cortisol concentration on muscle fiber characteristics, pork quality, and sensory quality of cooked pork.
    Choi YM; Jung KC; Choe JH; Kim BC
    Meat Sci; 2012 Aug; 91(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 22498136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of pork quality traits and muscle fiber characteristics on the eating quality of pork from various breeds.
    Lee SH; Choe JH; Choi YM; Jung KC; Rhee MS; Hong KC; Lee SK; Ryu YC; Kim BC
    Meat Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 21840135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meat quality of swine supplemented with ractopamine under commercial conditions in Brazil.
    Athayde NB; Dalla Costa OA; Roça RO; Guidoni AL; Ludtke CB; Lima GJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4604-10. PubMed ID: 23100577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of spaghetti meat abnormality on broiler chicken breast meat composition and technological quality.
    Tasoniero G; Zhuang H; Gamble GR; Bowker BC
    Poult Sci; 2020 Mar; 99(3):1724-1733. PubMed ID: 32111334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.