BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38232787)

  • 1. Changes in strength-related outcomes following velocity-monitored resistance training with 10 % and 20 % velocity loss in older adults.
    Marques DL; Neiva HP; Marinho DA; Marques MC
    Exp Gerontol; 2024 Feb; 186():112361. PubMed ID: 38232787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Velocity-Monitored Resistance Training in Older Adults: The Effects of Low-Velocity Loss Threshold on Strength and Functional Capacity.
    Marques DL; Neiva HP; Marinho DA; Marques MC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2022 Nov; 36(11):3200-3208. PubMed ID: 34537803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel Resistance Training Approach to Monitoring the Volume in Older Adults: The Role of Movement Velocity.
    Marques DL; Neiva HP; Marinho DA; Marques MC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33080817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strength training at high versus low external resistance in older adults: effects on muscle volume, muscle strength, and force-velocity characteristics.
    Van Roie E; Delecluse C; Coudyzer W; Boonen S; Bautmans I
    Exp Gerontol; 2013 Nov; 48(11):1351-61. PubMed ID: 23999311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal Approach to Load Progressions during Strength Training in Older Adults.
    Buskard ANL; Jacobs KA; Eltoukhy MM; Strand KL; Villanueva L; Desai PP; Signorile JF
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2019 Nov; 51(11):2224-2233. PubMed ID: 31107348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of High-Speed Versus Traditional Resistance Training in Older Adults.
    Vieira IP; Lobo PCB; Fisher J; Ramirez-Campilo R; Pimentel GD; Gentil P
    Sports Health; 2022; 14(2):283-291. PubMed ID: 34053371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load-power relationship in older adults: The influence of maximal mean and peak power values and their associations with lower and upper-limb functional capacity.
    Marques DL; Neiva HP; Marinho DA; Pires IM; Nunes C; Marques MC
    Front Physiol; 2022; 13():1007772. PubMed ID: 36213245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Velocity-Based Training on Load-Velocity Relationships in Leg Press and Chest Press for Older Persons.
    Calaway C; Mishra S; Parrino R; Martinez KJ; Mann JB; Signorile JF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jun; 38(6):1136-1143. PubMed ID: 38489597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Velocity Loss on Strength Performance in Bench Press Using a Weight Stack Machine.
    Rodiles-Guerrero L; Pareja-Blanco F; León-Prados JA
    Int J Sports Med; 2020 Oct; 41(13):921-928. PubMed ID: 32668476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Upper-Extremity Explosive Resistance Training With Older Adults Can Be Regulated Using the Rating of Perceived Exertion.
    Row Lazzarini BS; Dropp MW; Lloyd W
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Mar; 31(3):831-836. PubMed ID: 27359204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximal intended velocity training induces greater gains in bench press performance than deliberately slower half-velocity training.
    González-Badillo JJ; Rodríguez-Rosell D; Sánchez-Medina L; Gorostiaga EM; Pareja-Blanco F
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14(8):772-81. PubMed ID: 24734902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors Related to Average Concentric Velocity of Four Barbell Exercises at Various Loads.
    Fahs CA; Blumkaitis JC; Rossow LM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar; 33(3):597-605. PubMed ID: 30640305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of the Repetitions in Reserve-Based Rating of Perceived Exertion for the Bench Press in Experienced and Novice Benchers.
    Ormsbee MJ; Carzoli JP; Klemp A; Allman BR; Zourdos MC; Kim JS; Panton LB
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Feb; 33(2):337-345. PubMed ID: 28301439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Load-velocity relationship in the horizontal leg-press exercise in older women and men.
    Marques DL; Neiva HP; Marinho DA; Nunes C; Marques MC
    Exp Gerontol; 2021 Aug; 151():111391. PubMed ID: 33984450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of In-Season-Specific Resistance vs. A Regular Throwing Training Program on Throwing Velocity, Anthropometry, and Power Performance in Elite Handball Players.
    Hermassi S; van den Tillaar R; Khlifa R; Chelly MS; Chamari K
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2105-14. PubMed ID: 25627646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the relative load from movement velocity in the seated chest press exercise in older adults.
    Marques DL; Neiva HP; Marinho DA; Pires IM; Nunes C; Marques MC
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285386. PubMed ID: 37141287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in the Load-Velocity Profile Following Power- and Strength-Oriented Resistance-Training Programs.
    Pérez-Castilla A; García-Ramos A
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2020 Sep; 15(10):1460-1466. PubMed ID: 32932233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in Bench Press Velocity and Power After 8 Weeks of High-Load Cluster- or Traditional-Set Structures.
    Davies TB; Halaki M; Orr R; Helms ER; Hackett DA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Oct; 34(10):2734-2742. PubMed ID: 31009433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early adaptations to eccentric and high-velocity training on strength and functional performance in community-dwelling older adults.
    Leszczak TJ; Olson JM; Stafford J; Brezzo RD
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Feb; 27(2):442-8. PubMed ID: 22465984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in Maximal Strength, Velocity, and Power After 8 Weeks of Training With Pneumatic or Free Weight Resistance.
    Frost DM; Bronson S; Cronin JB; Newton RU
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Apr; 30(4):934-44. PubMed ID: 26418368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.