122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38233108)
21. Concordance, intra- and inter-observer agreements between light microscopy and whole slide imaging for samples acquired by EUS in pancreatic solid lesions.
Larghi A; Fornelli A; Lega S; Ragazzi M; Carlinfante G; Baccarini P; Fabbri C; Pierotti P; Tallini G; Bondi A; de Biase D
Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Nov; 51(11):1574-1579. PubMed ID: 31147212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic concordance between whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in cytopathology: A systematic review.
Girolami I; Pantanowitz L; Marletta S; Brunelli M; Mescoli C; Parisi A; Barresi V; Parwani A; Neil D; Scarpa A; Rossi ED; Eccher A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Jan; 128(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 31600035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Semantic Integrative Digital Pathology: Insights into Microsemiological Semantics and Image Analysis Scalability.
Racoceanu D; Capron F
Pathobiology; 2016; 83(2-3):148-55. PubMed ID: 27100713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Towards semantic-driven high-content image analysis: an operational instantiation for mitosis detection in digital histopathology.
Racoceanu D; Capron F
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Jun; 42():2-15. PubMed ID: 25442055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Digital Whole Slide Imaging Compared With Light Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology.
Borowsky AD; Glassy EF; Wallace WD; Kallichanda NS; Behling CA; Miller DV; Oswal HN; Feddersen RM; Bakhtar OR; Mendoza AE; Molden DP; Saffer HL; Wixom CR; Albro JE; Cessna MH; Hall BJ; Lloyd IE; Bishop JW; Darrow MA; Gui D; Jen KY; Walby JAS; Bauer SM; Cortez DA; Gandhi P; Rodgers MM; Rodriguez RA; Martin DR; McConnell TG; Reynolds SJ; Spigel JH; Stepenaskie SA; Viktorova E; Magari R; Wharton KA; Qiu J; Bauer TW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Oct; 144(10):1245-1253. PubMed ID: 32057275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Whole-slide imaging at primary pathological diagnosis: Validation of whole-slide imaging-based primary pathological diagnosis at twelve Japanese academic institutes.
Tabata K; Mori I; Sasaki T; Itoh T; Shiraishi T; Yoshimi N; Maeda I; Harada O; Taniyama K; Taniyama D; Watanabe M; Mikami Y; Sato S; Kashima Y; Fujimura S; Fukuoka J
Pathol Int; 2017 Nov; 67(11):547-554. PubMed ID: 28980740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of diagnostic accuracy using digital slides in routine histopathology.
Fónyad L; Krenács T; Nagy P; Zalatnai A; Csomor J; Sápi Z; Pápay J; Schönléber J; Diczházi C; Molnár B
Diagn Pathol; 2012 Mar; 7():35. PubMed ID: 22463804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Systematic Analysis of Discordant Diagnoses in Digital Pathology Compared With Light Microscopy.
Williams BJ; DaCosta P; Goacher E; Treanor D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Dec; 141(12):1712-1718. PubMed ID: 28467215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reading immunohistochemical slides on a computer monitor--a multisite performance study using 180 HER2-stained breast carcinomas.
Nassar A; Cohen C; Albitar M; Agersborg SS; Zhou W; Lynch KA; Heyman ER; Lange H; Siddiqui MT
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2011 May; 19(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 21475038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Application of microscope-based scanning software (Panoptiq) for the interpretation of cervicovaginal cytology specimens.
Groen R; Abe K; Yoon HS; Li Z; Shen R; Yoshikawa A; Nitanda T; Shimizu Y; Otsuka I; Fukuoka J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Dec; 125(12):918-925. PubMed ID: 28960858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Digital Versus Optical Diagnosis of Follicular Patterned Thyroid Lesions.
Aloqaily A; Polonia A; Campelos S; Alrefae N; Vale J; Caramelo A; Eloy C
Head Neck Pathol; 2021 Jun; 15(2):537-543. PubMed ID: 33128731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Pilot Validation Study Comparing Fluorescence-Imitating Brightfield Imaging, A Slide-Free Imaging Method, With Standard Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Hematoxylin-Eosin-Stained Tissue Section Histology for Primary Surgical Pathology Diagnosis.
Borowsky AD; Levenson RM; Gown AM; Morningstar T; Fleury TA; Henderson G; Schaberg K; Sybenga AB; Glassy EF; Taylor SL; Fereidouni F
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2024 Mar; 148(3):345-352. PubMed ID: 37226827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of Deep Learning Assistance on the Histopathologic Review of Lymph Nodes for Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Steiner DF; MacDonald R; Liu Y; Truszkowski P; Hipp JD; Gammage C; Thng F; Peng L; Stumpe MC
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Dec; 42(12):1636-1646. PubMed ID: 30312179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of multiple whole slide imaging scanners based on the guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.
Thrall MJ; Wimmer JL; Schwartz MR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 May; 139(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 25927149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Enabling digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: navigating through the implementation journey in an academic medical centre.
Cheng CL; Azhar R; Sng SH; Chua YQ; Hwang JS; Chin JP; Seah WK; Loke JC; Ang RH; Tan PH
J Clin Pathol; 2016 Sep; 69(9):784-92. PubMed ID: 26873939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multi-institutional comparison of whole slide digital imaging and optical microscopy for interpretation of hematoxylin-eosin-stained breast tissue sections.
Krishnamurthy S; Mathews K; McClure S; Murray M; Gilcrease M; Albarracin C; Spinosa J; Chang B; Ho J; Holt J; Cohen A; Giri D; Garg K; Bassett RL; Liang K
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1733-9. PubMed ID: 23947655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The performance of digital microscopy for primary diagnosis in human pathology: a systematic review.
Araújo ALD; Arboleda LPA; Palmier NR; Fonsêca JM; de Pauli Paglioni M; Gomes-Silva W; Ribeiro ACP; Brandão TB; Simonato LE; Speight PM; Fonseca FP; Lopes MA; de Almeida OP; Vargas PA; Madrid Troconis CC; Santos-Silva AR
Virchows Arch; 2019 Mar; 474(3):269-287. PubMed ID: 30685784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Utilizing Whole Slide Images for Pathology Peer Review and Working Groups.
Malarkey DE; Willson GA; Willson CJ; Adams ET; Olson GR; Witt WM; Elmore SA; Hardisty JF; Boyle MC; Crabbs TA; Miller RA
Toxicol Pathol; 2015 Dec; 43(8):1149-57. PubMed ID: 26511845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of whole slide imaging in the primary diagnosis of gynaecological pathology in a University Hospital.
Ordi J; Castillo P; Saco A; Del Pino M; Ordi O; Rodríguez-Carunchio L; Ramírez J
J Clin Pathol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 25355520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of a whole-slide image-based teleconsultation network.
Baidoshvili A; Stathonikos N; Freling G; Bart J; 't Hart N; van der Laak J; Doff J; van der Vegt B; Kluin PM; van Diest PJ
Histopathology; 2018 Nov; 73(5):777-783. PubMed ID: 29893996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
