120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38233155)
1. Influence of different convergence angles of abutment teeth and cement spaces on internal adaptation of anterior CAD-CAM fixed dental prostheses.
Ito K; Iwasaki T; Kitani J; Honda J; Kubochi K; Komine F
J Oral Sci; 2024; 66(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 38233155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of convergence angle and cement space on adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings.
Iwai T; Komine F; Kobayashi K; Saito A; Matsumura H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 18607834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of different convergence angles and tooth preparation heights on the internal adaptation of Cerec crowns.
Mou SH; Chai T; Wang JS; Shiau YY
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Mar; 87(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 11941350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal Adaptation of Provisional CAD/CAM Restorations Fabricated Using Various Simulated Digital Cement Space Settings.
Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B; Şeker E; Shah K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1064-1069. PubMed ID: 30231093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns.
Nakamura T; Dei N; Kojima T; Wakabayashi K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 12854786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations.
Carbajal Mejía JB; Yatani H; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcomes of single crown and 3-unit bi-layered zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: An upto 6- year retrospective clinical study: Clinical outcomes of zirconia FDPs.
Alfadhli R; Alshammari Y; Baig MR; Omar R
J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104321. PubMed ID: 36220517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of virtual cement space and restorative materials on the adaptation of CAD-CAM endocrowns.
Zheng Z; Wang H; Mo J; Ling Z; Zeng Y; Zhang Y; Wang J; Yan W
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):580. PubMed ID: 36494663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses produced by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and the lost-wax metal casting technique assessed using the triple-scan protocol.
Dahl BE; Dahl JE; Rønold HJ
Eur J Oral Sci; 2018 Feb; 126(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 29171091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro study on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns.
Nakamura T; Tanaka H; Kinuta S; Akao T; Okamoto K; Wakabayashi K; Yatani H
Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):456-9. PubMed ID: 16279739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of cement space on marginal discrepancy and retention of CAD/CAM crown.
Hassan LA; Goo CL
Dent Mater J; 2021 Sep; 40(5):1189-1195. PubMed ID: 34078778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Influence of preparation height and cement space on the fit and retention of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing zirconia crown].
Xi S; Wu ZX; Gao CC; Meng YC; Pei DD; Lu Y
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 38(3):263-269. PubMed ID: 32573132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical efficacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-year results.
Raigrodski AJ; Yu A; Chiche GJ; Hochstedler JL; Mancl LA; Mohamed SE
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):214-22. PubMed ID: 23031727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of various digital cement space settings on the adaptation of CAD/CAM occlusal veneer "micro-ct evaluation".
Elbadawy AA; Elaziz MHA; Alnazzawi AA; Borzangy SS
Dent Mater J; 2021 May; 40(3):625-630. PubMed ID: 33390385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Differences in Axial Thickness and Type of Cement on Fracture Resistance in Composite Resin CAD/CAM Crowns.
Masuda T; Nomoto S; Sato T; Kanda Y; Sakai T; Tsuyuki Y
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2019 Feb; 60(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 30700646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
