These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3823334)

  • 21. Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.
    Rohrer D; Pashler HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 12747495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention.
    Grice GR; Canham L; Boroughs JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 May; 35(5):451-63. PubMed ID: 6462872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Metacognitive evaluation in the avoidance of demand.
    Dunn TL; Lutes DJ; Risko EF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1372-87. PubMed ID: 27123679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Asymmetrical learning between a tactile and visual serial RT task.
    Abrahamse EL; van der Lubbe RH; Verwey WB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 17896207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Keep an eye on your hands: on the role of visual mechanisms in processing of haptic space.
    Postma A; Zuidhoek S; Noordzij ML; Kappers AM
    Cogn Process; 2008 Mar; 9(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 18196305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Blocks in choice responding as a function of age and physical fitness.
    Bunce DJ; Warr PB; Cochrane T
    Psychol Aging; 1993 Mar; 8(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 8461111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Paired choice reaction tasks in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Nakashima K; Shimoyama R; Takahashi K
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1993 Mar; 87(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 8475686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Just tell me what to do: bringing back experimenter control in active contingency tasks with the command-performance procedure and finding cue density effects along the way.
    Hannah SD; Beneteau JL
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 19271817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pointing, looking at, and pressing keys: A diffusion model account of response modality.
    Gomez P; Ratcliff R; Childers R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1515-23. PubMed ID: 26322685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?
    Halvorson KM; Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1403-9. PubMed ID: 25754530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of a non-informative cueing signal in a three-choice reaction-time task.
    Possamaï CA
    Psychol Res; 1992; 54(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 1620800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification.
    Ratcliff R; Rouder JN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Feb; 26(1):127-40. PubMed ID: 10696609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.
    Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 16237555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exemplar similarity and rule application.
    Hahn U; Prat-Sala M; Pothos EM; Brumby DP
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19815187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task and driving performance of patients with a severe concussion of the brain.
    Stokx LC; Gaillard AW
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1986 Aug; 8(4):421-36. PubMed ID: 3745415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Behaviorally fractionated reaction time to an omitted stimulus: tests with visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli.
    Hernández OH; Huchín-Ramirez TC; Vogel-Sprott M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Jun; 100(3 Pt 2):1066-80. PubMed ID: 16158693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Willed action and attention to the selection of action.
    Lau HC; Rogers RD; Ramnani N; Passingham RE
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1407-15. PubMed ID: 15050566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Entropy conservation in the control of human action.
    Hong SL; Newell KM
    Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2008 Apr; 12(2):163-90. PubMed ID: 18384715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.