136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38233932)
1. Participant comprehension and acceptability of enhanced versus text-only electronic informed consent: an innovative qualitative pilot study.
Corneli A; Starling S; Choi Y; Vosylius J; Madre L; Mackinnon A; Tenaerts P
Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2024 Jan; 10(1):10. PubMed ID: 38233932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digitalizing the Clinical Research Informed Consent Process: Assessing the Participant Experience in Comparison With Traditional Paper-Based Methods.
Buckley MT; O'Shea MR; Kundu S; Lipitz-Snyderman A; Kuperman G; Shah S; Iasonos A; Houston C; Terzulli SL; Lengfellner JM; Sabbatini P
JCO Oncol Pract; 2023 Mar; 19(3):e355-e364. PubMed ID: 36534933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing and Practical Implementation of a User-Friendly Personalized and Long-Term Electronic Informed Consent Prototype in Clinical Research: Mixed Methods Study.
De Sutter E; Geerts D; Yskout K; Verreydt S; Borry P; Barbier L; Huys I
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e46306. PubMed ID: 38113088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.
Cohen E; Byrom B; Becher A; Jörntén-Karlsson M; Mackenzie AK
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e43883. PubMed ID: 37656499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Personalized and long-term electronic informed consent in clinical research: stakeholder views.
De Sutter E; Borry P; Geerts D; Huys I
BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):108. PubMed ID: 34332572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of Electronic Informed Consent Platforms for Consenting Patients to Research Studies: A Scoping Review.
Guarino J; Parvanova I; Finkelstein J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jun; 290():777-781. PubMed ID: 35673123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using provocative design to foster electronic informed consent innovation.
De Sutter E; Verreydt S; Yskout K; Geerts D; Borry P; Outtier A; Ferrante M; Vandermeulen C; Vanmechelen N; Van der Schueren B; Huys I
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Nov; 22(1):296. PubMed ID: 36397108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informing a European guidance framework on electronic informed consent in clinical research: a qualitative study.
De Sutter E; Borry P; Huys I; Barbier L
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Feb; 23(1):181. PubMed ID: 36810088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of an Educational and Interactive Informed Consent Process on Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.
Lee YS; Cho DC; Sung JK; Han I; Kim CH; Kim JY; Kim KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Feb; 45(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 31513103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rethinking informed consent in the time of COVID-19: An exploratory survey.
De Sutter E; Lalova-Spinks T; Borry P; Valcke P; Kindt E; Negrouk A; Verhenneman G; Derèze JJ; Storme R; Huys I
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():995688. PubMed ID: 36237540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pragmatic randomized trial comparing tablet computer informed consent to traditional paper-based methods for an osteoporosis study.
Warriner AH; Foster PJ; Mudano A; Wright NC; Melton ME; Sattui SE; Calmbach W; Curtis JR; Kilgore M; Lewis CE; Pace W; Saag KG
Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2016 Aug; 3():32-38. PubMed ID: 29736454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.
Montalvo W; Larson E
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Nov; 46(6):423-31. PubMed ID: 25130209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era.
De Sutter E; Coopmans B; Vanendert F; Dooms M; Allegaert K; Borry P; Huys I
Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():724431. PubMed ID: 34540773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digitizing the Informed Consent Process: A Review of the Regulatory Landscape in the European Union.
De Sutter E; Meszaros J; Borry P; Huys I
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():906448. PubMed ID: 35692551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting.
Skelton E; Drey N; Rutherford M; Ayers S; Malamateniou C
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Nov; 143():104271. PubMed ID: 32979650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Participant comprehension and perspectives regarding the convenience, security, and satisfaction with teleconsent compared to in-person consent: A parallel-group pilot study among Danish citizens.
Nyholm Gaarskjær A; Crookshanks Duroux M; Hogreffe R
Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2022 Aug; 28():100927. PubMed ID: 35669485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials.
Nishimura A; Carey J; Erwin PJ; Tilburt JC; Murad MH; McCormick JB
BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 14():28. PubMed ID: 23879694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electronic informed consent: effects on enrolment, practical and economic benefits, challenges, and drawbacks-a systematic review of studies within randomized controlled trials.
Mazzochi AT; Dennis M; Chun HY
Trials; 2023 Feb; 24(1):127. PubMed ID: 36810093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
