These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38233946)

  • 1. Statistical inference for agreement between multiple raters on a binary scale.
    Vanbelle S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 May; 77(2):245-260. PubMed ID: 38233946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple Approach to Calculate Random Effects Model Tolerance Intervals to Set Release and Shelf-Life Specification Limits of Pharmaceutical Products.
    Montes RO; Burdick RK; Leblond DJ
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2019; 73(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 30361286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-inferiority test and confidence interval for the difference in correlated proportions in diagnostic procedures based on multiple raters.
    Saeki H; Tango T
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3313-27. PubMed ID: 21953516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of confidence interval methods for an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
    Ionan AC; Polley MY; McShane LM; Dobbin KK
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Nov; 14():121. PubMed ID: 25417040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A general goodness-of-fit approach for inference procedures concerning the kappa statistic.
    Altaye M; Donner A; Eliasziw M
    Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(16):2479-88. PubMed ID: 11512137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalized confidence interval for an agreement between raters.
    Bhaumik DK; Shi H; Reda DJ; Sinha BK
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2230-2238. PubMed ID: 33576023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size requirements for interval estimation of the kappa statistic for interobserver agreement studies with a binary outcome and multiple raters.
    Donner A; Rotondi MA
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 31. PubMed ID: 21969984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inference procedures for assessing interobserver agreement among multiple raters.
    Altaye M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):584-8. PubMed ID: 11414588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian inference for kappa from single and multiple studies.
    Basu S; Banerjee M; Sen A
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):577-82. PubMed ID: 10877319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjusted inference procedures for the interobserver agreement in twin studies.
    Dixon SN; Donner A; Shoukri MM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Aug; 25(4):1260-71. PubMed ID: 23487017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian inference of dependent kappa for binary ratings.
    Sen A; Li P; Ye W; Franzblau A
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(26):5947-5960. PubMed ID: 34542193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian approach for sample size determination in method comparison studies.
    Yin K; Choudhary PK; Varghese D; Goodman SR
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2273-89. PubMed ID: 17979182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nomogram for sample size calculation on a straightforward basis for the kappa statistic.
    Hong H; Choi Y; Hahn S; Park SK; Park BJ
    Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):673-80. PubMed ID: 25088752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A confidence interval approach to sample size estimation for interobserver agreement studies with multiple raters and outcomes.
    Rotondi MA; Donner A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):778-84. PubMed ID: 22560852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overall indices for assessing agreement among multiple raters.
    Jang JH; Manatunga AK; Taylor AT; Long Q
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4200-4215. PubMed ID: 30062738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Specific agreement on dichotomous outcomes can be calculated for more than two raters.
    de Vet HCW; Dikmans RE; Eekhout I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():85-89. PubMed ID: 28088591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Test by Any Other Name: P Values, Bayes Factors, and Statistical Inference.
    Stern HS
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 26881954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of collapsing multinomial data when assessing agreement.
    Bartfay E; Donner A
    Int J Epidemiol; 2000 Dec; 29(6):1070-5. PubMed ID: 11101550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of sample size determination methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in the one-way analysis of variance model.
    Mondal D; Vanbelle S; Cassese A; Candel MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Mar; 33(3):532-553. PubMed ID: 38320802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing agreement between multiple raters with missing rating information, applied to breast cancer tumour grading.
    Fanshawe TR; Lynch AG; Ellis IO; Green AR; Hanka R
    PLoS One; 2008 Aug; 3(8):e2925. PubMed ID: 18698346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.