These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38235220)

  • 1. Risk Assessment by a Passenger of an Autonomous Vehicle Among Pedestrians: Relationship Between Subjective and Physiological Measures.
    Petit J; Charron C; Mars F
    Front Neuroergon; 2021; 2():682119. PubMed ID: 38235220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subjective risk and associated electrodermal activity of a self-driving car passenger in an urban shared space.
    Petit J; Charron C; Mars F
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0289913. PubMed ID: 38033016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Bayesian extreme value theory modelling framework to assess corridor-wide pedestrian safety using autonomous vehicle sensor data.
    Singh S; Ali Y; Haque MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107416. PubMed ID: 38056025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of safety measures on driver's speed behavior at pedestrian crossings.
    Bella F; Silvestri M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Oct; 83():111-24. PubMed ID: 26253423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Passenger and heavy vehicle collisions with pedestrians: Assessment of injury mechanisms and risk.
    Schubert A; Babisch S; Scanlon JM; Campolettano ET; Roessler R; Unger T; McMurry TL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107139. PubMed ID: 37320981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stated preference analysis of autonomous vehicle among bicyclists and pedestrians in Pittsburgh using Bayesian Networks.
    Imanishimwe D; Kumar A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107278. PubMed ID: 37683566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.
    Rasch A; Panero G; Boda CN; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 May; 139():105494. PubMed ID: 32203729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Have pedestrian subsystem tests improved passenger car front shape?
    Li G; Wang F; Otte D; Cai Z; Simms C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():143-150. PubMed ID: 29571012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment.
    Chrysler ST; Ahmad O; Schwarz CW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S12-7. PubMed ID: 26027964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Features of pedestrian behavior in car-to-pedestrian contact situations in near-miss incidents in Japan.
    Matsui Y; Hitosugi M; Doi T; Oikawa S; Takahashi K; Ando K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14 Suppl():S58-63. PubMed ID: 23905703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Do Human-Driven Vehicles Avoid Pedestrians in Interactive Environments? A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Sun S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z; Deng P; Tian K; Wei C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task difficulty, risk feeling, and safety margin in the determination of driver behavior to prepare for traffic conflicts.
    Kochi F; Saito Y; Uchida N; Itoh M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107284. PubMed ID: 37708833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of Lateral Auditory Collision Warnings: Should Warnings Be Toward Danger or Toward Safety?
    Chen J; Šabić E; Mishler S; Parker C; Yamaguchi M
    Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 64(2):418-435. PubMed ID: 32779474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian Driver Agent Model for Autonomous Vehicles System Based on Knowledge-Aware and Real-Time Data.
    Ma J; Xie H; Song K; Liu H
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33418987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Virtual testing of speed reduction schemes on urban collector roads.
    Domenichini L; Branzi V; Meocci M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():38-51. PubMed ID: 29101788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The safety potential of enhanced lateral vehicle positioning.
    Sternlund S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 33556264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impacts of enforcement cameras on pedestrians' risk perception and drivers' behaviors at non-signalized crosswalks.
    Li H; Hu H; Zhang Z; Ren G; Liu X
    J Safety Res; 2022 Jun; 81():313-325. PubMed ID: 35589302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the impacts of built environment on pedestrian injury severity involving distracted driving.
    Khan NA; Habib MA
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():97-108. PubMed ID: 35249632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How effective are pedestrian crash prevention systems in improving pedestrian safety? Harnessing large-scale experimental data.
    Mahdinia I; Khattak AJ; Mohsena Haque A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106669. PubMed ID: 35427907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.