These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38235351)

  • 1. Meshed Dermal Sling for Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
    Paganini F; Bascialla E; Corno M; Garutti L; Tellarini A; Cozzi S; Buttarelli F; Fasoli V; Valdatta L; Tamborini F
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2024 Jan; 12(1):e5534. PubMed ID: 38235351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Yang JY; Kim CW; Lee JW; Kim SK; Lee SA; Hwang E
    Arch Plast Surg; 2019 Nov; 46(6):550-557. PubMed ID: 31775208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: Do We See a Difference?
    Manrique OJ; Huang TC; Martinez-Jorge J; Ciudad P; Forte AJ; Bustos SS; Boughey JC; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Galan R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):263e-272e. PubMed ID: 31985613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One-Step Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Dermal Matrix-Covered Implant Compared to Submuscular Implantation: Functional and Cost Evaluation.
    Cattelani L; Polotto S; Arcuri MF; Pedrazzi G; Linguadoca C; Bonati E
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 29275104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
    Karp NS; Salibian AA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Baker BG; Irri R; MacCallum V; Chattopadhyay R; Murphy J; Harvey JR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing perioperative strategies to maximize success with prepectoral breast reconstruction.
    Srinivasa DR; Holland M; Sbitany H
    Gland Surg; 2019 Feb; 8(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 30842924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of the Surgical Technique for "Breast in a Day" Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Transitioning from Dual-Plane to Prepectoral Implant Placement.
    Antony AK; Poirier J; Madrigrano A; Kopkash KA; Robinson EC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jun; 143(6):1547-1556. PubMed ID: 31136464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prepectoral breast reconstruction.
    Kim SE
    Yeungnam Univ J Med; 2019 Sep; 36(3):201-207. PubMed ID: 31620634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.
    Scheflan M; Allweis TM; Ben Yehuda D; Maisel Lotan A
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Nov; 8(11):e3265. PubMed ID: 33299724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix for Two-Staged Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: An Institutional Experience.
    Luo J; Willis RN; Ohlsen SM; Piccinin M; Moores N; Kwok AC; Agarwal JP
    Arch Plast Surg; 2022 Mar; 49(2):166-173. PubMed ID: 35832668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
    Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
    Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
    Woo J; Seung IH; Hong SE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Nov; 73(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 32921621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement.
    Wormer BA; Valmadrid AC; Ganesh Kumar N; Al Kassis S; Rankin TM; Kaoutzanis C; Higdon KK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Aug; 144(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 31348326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Managing the animation deformity in breast reconstruction transposing the implant to a partial prepectoral pocket: Early experience and preliminary results with a new technique.
    Pozzi M; Patanè L; Redi U; Turriziani G; Vietti V; Zoccali G; De Vita R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():139-145. PubMed ID: 37716250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When to Consider Prepectoral Implant Conversion After Subpectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction and How to Plan It.
    Salgarello M; Barone Adesi L; Macrì G; Visconti G
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):NP1071-NP1077. PubMed ID: 37668406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.