These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38235458)

  • 1. Real-Time Audio Processing of Real-Life Soundscapes for EEG Analysis: ERPs Based on Natural Sound Onsets.
    Hölle D; Blum S; Kissner S; Debener S; Bleichner MG
    Front Neuroergon; 2022; 3():793061. PubMed ID: 38235458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Smartphone-based ear-electroencephalography to study sound processing in everyday life.
    Hölle D; Bleichner MG
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Oct; 58(7):3671-3685. PubMed ID: 37612776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating the attentional focus to workplace-related soundscapes in a complex audio-visual-motor task using EEG.
    Rosenkranz M; Cetin T; Uslar VN; Bleichner MG
    Front Neuroergon; 2022; 3():1062227. PubMed ID: 38235454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extracting human cortical responses to sound onsets and acoustic feature changes in real music, and their relation to event rate.
    Haumann NT; Lumaca M; Kliuchko M; Santacruz JL; Vuust P; Brattico E
    Brain Res; 2021 Mar; 1754():147248. PubMed ID: 33417893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-Variate EEG Analysis as a Novel Tool to Examine Brain Responses to Naturalistic Music Stimuli.
    Sturm I; Dähne S; Blankertz B; Curio G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0141281. PubMed ID: 26510120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.
    Shahin AJ; Roberts LE; Miller LM; McDonald KL; Alain C
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17899352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG Recording and Online Signal Processing on Android: A Multiapp Framework for Brain-Computer Interfaces on Smartphone.
    Blum S; Debener S; Emkes R; Volkening N; Fudickar S; Bleichner MG
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():3072870. PubMed ID: 29349070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention-dependent sound offset-related brain potentials.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):663-77. PubMed ID: 26757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-density ear-EEG for understanding ear-centered EEG.
    Meiser A; Lena Knoll A; Bleichner MG
    J Neural Eng; 2024 Jan; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 38118173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the Emotiv EPOC(®) EEG gaming system for measuring research quality auditory ERPs.
    Badcock NA; Mousikou P; Mahajan Y; de Lissa P; Thie J; McArthur G
    PeerJ; 2013; 1():e38. PubMed ID: 23638374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The sound of silence: Predictive error responses to unexpected sound omission in adults.
    Prete DA; Heikoop D; McGillivray JE; Reilly JP; Trainor LJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Apr; 55(8):1972-1985. PubMed ID: 35357048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central processing of speech sounds and non-speech sounds with similar spectral distribution: An auditory evoked potential study.
    Kaneshiro S; Hiraumi H; Sato H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2020 Oct; 47(5):727-733. PubMed ID: 32102744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit auditory perception of local and global irregularities in passive listening condition.
    Liaukovich K; Ukraintseva Y; Martynova O
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Jan; 165():108129. PubMed ID: 34929262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do video sounds interfere with auditory event-related potentials?
    McArthur GM; Bishop DV; Proudfoot M
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 May; 35(2):329-33. PubMed ID: 12834093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural signatures of automatic repetition detection in temporally regular and jittered acoustic sequences.
    Ringer H; Schröger E; Grimm S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0284836. PubMed ID: 37948467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ear-EEG compares well to cap-EEG in recording auditory ERPs: a quantification of signal loss.
    Meiser A; Bleichner MG
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Apr; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35316801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audio-visual spatial alignment improves integration in the presence of a competing audio-visual stimulus.
    Fleming JT; Noyce AL; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107530. PubMed ID: 32574616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERPs differentiate syllable and nonphonetic sound processing in children and adults.
    Ceponiene R; Alku P; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Jul; 42(4):391-406. PubMed ID: 16008768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.