These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38235927)

  • 21. Early and late clinico-pathologic outcomes of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched comparison of robotic and laparoscopic approaches.
    Park CH; Bae SU; Jeong WK; Baek SK
    Int J Med Robot; 2021 Dec; 17(6):e2324. PubMed ID: 34405948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
    D'Annibale A; Pernazza G; Monsellato I; Pende V; Lucandri G; Mazzocchi P; Alfano G
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):1887-95. PubMed ID: 23292566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.
    Trastulli S; Farinella E; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Avenia N; Sciannameo F; Gullà N; Noya G; Boselli C
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):e134-56. PubMed ID: 22151033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes.
    Bianchi PP; Ceriani C; Locatelli A; Spinoglio G; Zampino MG; Sonzogni A; Crosta C; Andreoni B
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Nov; 24(11):2888-94. PubMed ID: 20526623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing outcomes of robotic versus open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Flynn J; Patil S; Widmar M; Quezada-Diaz F; Lynn P; Strombom P; Temple L; Smith JJ; Wei IH; Pappou EP; Guillem JG; Paty PP; Nash GM; Weiser MR; Garcia-Aguilar J
    BJS Open; 2021 Nov; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 35040943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the short-term efficacy of two types of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Lei Y; Jiang J; Zhu S; Yi B; Li J
    Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Jan; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 34846614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.
    Gómez Ruiz M; Parra IM; Palazuelos CM; Martín JA; Fernández CC; Diego JC; Fleitas MG
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jan; 58(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 25489707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of robotic total mesorectal excision on survival of patients with rectal cancer-a propensity matched analysis.
    Tejedor P; Sagias F; Flashman K; Lee YH; Naqvi S; Kandala N; Khan J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Dec; 34(12):2081-2089. PubMed ID: 31712874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic pelvic side-wall dissection and en-bloc excision for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: outcomes on feasibility and safety.
    Lokuhetty N; Larach JT; Rajkomar AKS; Mohan H; Waters PS; Heriot AG; Warrier SK
    ANZ J Surg; 2022 Sep; 92(9):2185-2191. PubMed ID: 35555959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.
    Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
    Br J Surg; 2021 Nov; 108(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 34370834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beyond transanal total mesorectal excision: short-term outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer requiring resection beyond total mesorectal excision.
    Larach JT; Rajkomar AKS; Smart PJ; McCormick JJ; Heriot AG; Warrier SK
    Colorectal Dis; 2021 Apr; 23(4):823-833. PubMed ID: 33217140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.
    Odermatt M; Ahmed J; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4067-4076. PubMed ID: 28271267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Vennix S; Pelzers L; Bouvy N; Beets GL; Pierie JP; Wiggers T; Breukink S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Apr; 2014(4):CD005200. PubMed ID: 24737031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Simillis C; Lal N; Thoukididou SN; Kontovounisios C; Smith JJ; Hompes R; Adamina M; Tekkis PP
    Ann Surg; 2019 Jul; 270(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 30720507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach for minimally invasive lateral pelvic lymph node dissection of advanced lower rectal cancer: a retrospective study comparing short-term outcomes.
    Ishizaki T; Mazaki J; Kasahara K; Udo R; Tago T; Nagakawa Y
    Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Jul; 27(7):579-587. PubMed ID: 37157049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic rectal resection preserves anorectal function: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Grass JK; Chen CC; Melling N; Lingala B; Kemper M; Scognamiglio P; Persiani R; Tirelli F; Caricato M; Capolupo GT; Izbicki JR; Perez DR
    Int J Med Robot; 2021 Dec; 17(6):e2329. PubMed ID: 34463416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic male and laparoscopic female sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer share similar specimen quality, complication rates and long-term oncological outcomes.
    Aliyev V; Piozzi GN; Huseynov E; Mustafayev TZ; Kayku V; Goksel S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 36943657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robotic surgery for locally advanced T4 rectal cancer: feasibility and oncological quality.
    Gomez Ruiz M; Ballestero Diego R; Tejedor P; Cagigas Fernandez C; Cristobal Poch L; Suarez Pazos N; Castillo Diego J
    Updates Surg; 2023 Apr; 75(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 36763301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.