These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38236257)

  • 1. Uncorking the central bottleneck: Even novel tasks can be performed automatically.
    Lyphout-Spitz M; Maquestiaux F; Ruthruff E; Chaloyard S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jan; 50(1):74-98. PubMed ID: 38236257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bypassing the central bottleneck with easy tasks: Beyond ideomotor compatibility.
    Lyphout-Spitz M; Maquestiaux F; Ruthruff E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):501-511. PubMed ID: 34755320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual-task automatization: The key role of sensory-motor modality compatibility.
    Maquestiaux F; Ruthruff E; Defer A; Ibrahime S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):752-772. PubMed ID: 29285603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ideomotor compatibility enables automatic response selection.
    Maquestiaux F; Lyphout-Spitz M; Ruthruff E; Arexis M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Aug; 27(4):742-750. PubMed ID: 32323163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1279-1293. PubMed ID: 36107664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the over-reliance on central attention (ORCA) hypothesis: Do older adults have difficulty automatizing especially easy tasks?
    Maquestiaux F; Ruthruff E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Sep; 150(9):1722-1740. PubMed ID: 33444045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.
    Maquestiaux F; Laguë-Beauvais M; Ruthruff E; Bherer L
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1262-82. PubMed ID: 18927042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Central as well as Peripheral Attentional Bottlenecks in Dual-Task Performance Activate Lateral Prefrontal Cortices.
    Szameitat AJ; Vanloo A; Müller HJ
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():119. PubMed ID: 27014044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect?
    Van Selst M; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Oct; 25(5):1268-83. PubMed ID: 10531663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Dominance Effect upon Passing the Central Bottleneck of Information Processing.
    Yao XQ; Yang YQ; Chen SY; Sun W; Chen Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Aug; 131(16):1926-1935. PubMed ID: 30082523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practice-related optimization of dual-task performance: Efficient task instantiation during overlapping task processing.
    Schubert T; Strobach T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1884-1904. PubMed ID: 30335413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):274-86. PubMed ID: 12466925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck.
    Schumacher EH; Seymour TL; Glass JM; Fencsik DE; Lauber EJ; Kieras DE; Meyer DE
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 11340917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Separating limits on preparation versus online processing in multitasking paradigms: Evidence for resource models.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 27808552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants of central processing order in psychological refractory period paradigms: central arrival times, detection times, or preparation?
    Leonhard T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):2012-43. PubMed ID: 21678229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing order in dual-task situations: The "first-come, first-served" principle and the impact of task order instructions.
    Strobach T; Hendrich E; Kübler S; Müller H; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1785-1803. PubMed ID: 29978280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Spencer HC; Forgaard CJ; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introspection is not always blind to the costs of multitasking: The case of task switching.
    Bratzke D; Bryce D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jun; 45(6):980-992. PubMed ID: 30113205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The working memory costs of a central attentional bottleneck in multitasking.
    Otermans PCJ; Parton A; Szameitat AJ
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1774-1791. PubMed ID: 34751812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.