These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38236269)

  • 1. Effects of age and word frequency on Korean visual word recognition: Evidence from a web-based large-scale lexical-decision task.
    Baek H; Gordon PC; Choi W
    Psychol Aging; 2024 May; 39(3):231-244. PubMed ID: 38236269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in Cantonese Chinese word recognition: Insights from the Chinese Lexicon Project.
    Lim RY; Yap MJ; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):504-518. PubMed ID: 32019427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A paradox of apparent brainless behavior: The time-course of compound word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Kuperman V
    Cortex; 2019 Jul; 116():250-267. PubMed ID: 30149964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual word recognition across the adult lifespan.
    Cohen-Shikora ER; Balota DA
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Aug; 31(5):488-502. PubMed ID: 27336629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical access versus lexical decision processes for auditory, visual, and audiovisual items: Insights from behavioral and neural measures.
    López Zunini RA; Baart M; Samuel AG; Armstrong BC
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107305. PubMed ID: 31838100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Embodied cognition comes of age: A processing advantage for action words is modulated by aging and the task.
    Miklashevsky A; Reifegerste J; García AM; Pulvermüller F; Balota DA; Veríssimo J; Ullman MT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jul; 153(7):1725-1764. PubMed ID: 38780562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthographic and root frequency effects in Arabic: Evidence from eye movements and lexical decision.
    Hermena EW; Liversedge SP; Bouamama S; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):934-954. PubMed ID: 30247050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.
    Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB; White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1714-1729. PubMed ID: 29672115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
    Lété B; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interplay between morphology and frequency in lexical access: the case of the base frequency effect.
    Vannest J; Newport EL; Newman AJ; Bavelier D
    Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 1373():144-59. PubMed ID: 21167136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.
    Yap MJ; Sibley DE; Balota DA; Ratcliff R; Rueckl J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):597-613. PubMed ID: 25329078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphological effects in visual word recognition: Children, adolescents, and adults.
    Dawson N; Rastle K; Ricketts J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):645-654. PubMed ID: 28956945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
    Hendrix P; Sun CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adult age differences in letter-level and word-level processing.
    Allen PA; Madden DJ; Crozier LC
    Psychol Aging; 1991 Jun; 6(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 1863395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):2022-2038. PubMed ID: 30117382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers.
    Kuperman V; Van Dyke JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):802-23. PubMed ID: 23339352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The resolution of visual noise in word recognition.
    Pae HK; Lee YW
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Jun; 44(3):337-58. PubMed ID: 25283377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.