These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38236409)
1. Cost-utility analysis of Dexcom G6 real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus FreeStyle Libre 1 intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes in Belgium. Visser MM; Van Muylder A; Charleer S; Isitt JJ; Roze S; De Block C; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Luyten J; Gillard P; Verhaeghe N Diabetologia; 2024 Apr; 67(4):650-662. PubMed ID: 38236409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: 24-month results from the randomised ALERTT1 trial. Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2023 Feb; 11(2):96-108. PubMed ID: 36702566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing real-time and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes (ALERTT1): a 6-month, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P Lancet; 2021 Jun; 397(10291):2275-2283. PubMed ID: 34089660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lower Glycated Hemoglobin with Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than with Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring After 1 Year: The CORRIDA LIFE Study. Radovnická L; Hásková A; Do QD; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Mikeš O; Cihlář D; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Prázný M; Šoupal J Diabetes Technol Ther; 2022 Dec; 24(12):859-867. PubMed ID: 36037056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Baseline User Characteristics on the Benefits of Real-Time Versus Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Moderator Analyses of the ALERTT1 Trial. Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 May; 18(3):660-666. PubMed ID: 36172693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Switching from Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring with a Predictive Urgent Low Soon Alert Reduces Exposure to Hypoglycemia. Preechasuk L; Avari P; Oliver N; Reddy M Diabetes Technol Ther; 2024 Jul; 26(7):498-502. PubMed ID: 38315504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes in England. Elliott RA; Rogers G; Evans ML; Neupane S; Rayman G; Lumley S; Cranston I; Narendran P; Sutton CJ; Taxiarchi VP; Burns M; Thabit H; Wilmot EG; Leelarathna L; Diabet Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):e15232. PubMed ID: 37750427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial. Hásková A; Radovnická L; Petruželková L; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Kádě O; Matoulek M; Prázný M; Šoupal J Diabetes Care; 2020 Nov; 43(11):2744-2750. PubMed ID: 32859607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-world glycaemic outcomes in adult persons with type 1 diabetes using a real-time continuous glucose monitor compared to an intermittently scanned glucose monitor: A retrospective observational study from the Canadian LMC diabetes registry (REAL-CGM-T1D). Brown RE; Chu L; Norman GJ; Abitbol A Diabet Med; 2022 Nov; 39(11):e14937. PubMed ID: 36065977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Glycemic Metrics Measured Simultaneously by Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes. Nørgaard SK; Mathiesen ER; Nørgaard K; Ringholm L Diabetes Technol Ther; 2021 Oct; 23(10):665-672. PubMed ID: 34086494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes. Avari P; Moscardo V; Jugnee N; Oliver N; Reddy M J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):567-574. PubMed ID: 31375042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Heinemann L; Freckmann G; Ehrmann D; Faber-Heinemann G; Guerra S; Waldenmaier D; Hermanns N Lancet; 2018 Apr; 391(10128):1367-1377. PubMed ID: 29459019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-utility of real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in people with type 1 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections in Denmark. Alshannaq H; Cogswell G; Pollock RF; Ahmed W; Norman GJ; Lynch PM; Roze S Diabetes Obes Metab; 2023 Sep; 25(9):2704-2713. PubMed ID: 37334522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the glycaemic outcomes between real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) among adults and children with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Zhou Y; Sardana D; Kuroko S; Haszard JJ; de Block MI; Weng J; Jefferies C; Wheeler BJ Diabet Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):e15280. PubMed ID: 38197238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of factors associated with improved glycemic control after switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes. Yamada E; Nakajima Y; Horiguchi K; Okada S; Yamada M Endocr J; 2023 Dec; 70(12):1187-1193. PubMed ID: 37766568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term Cost-Effectiveness of Dexcom G6 Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes in the U.K. Roze S; Isitt J; Smith-Palmer J; Javanbakht M; Lynch P Diabetes Care; 2020 Oct; 43(10):2411-2417. PubMed ID: 32647050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of flash glucose monitoring with real time continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Massa GG; Gys I; Bevilacqua E; Wijnands A; Zeevaert R Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 152():111-118. PubMed ID: 31121275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Personalizing the Use of a Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device in Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes: A Cost-Effectiveness Perspective in the Netherlands (FLARE-NL 9). Emamipour S; van Dijk PR; Bilo HJG; Edens MA; van der Galiën O; Postma MJ; Feenstra TL; van Boven JFM J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 Jan; 18(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 35815617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jancev M; Vissers TACM; Visseren FLJ; van Bon AC; Serné EH; DeVries JH; de Valk HW; van Sloten TT Diabetologia; 2024 May; 67(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 38363342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]