196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38236409)
1. Cost-utility analysis of Dexcom G6 real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus FreeStyle Libre 1 intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes in Belgium.
Visser MM; Van Muylder A; Charleer S; Isitt JJ; Roze S; De Block C; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Luyten J; Gillard P; Verhaeghe N
Diabetologia; 2024 Apr; 67(4):650-662. PubMed ID: 38236409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: 24-month results from the randomised ALERTT1 trial.
Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2023 Feb; 11(2):96-108. PubMed ID: 36702566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing real-time and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes (ALERTT1): a 6-month, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
Lancet; 2021 Jun; 397(10291):2275-2283. PubMed ID: 34089660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lower Glycated Hemoglobin with Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than with Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring After 1 Year: The CORRIDA LIFE Study.
Radovnická L; Hásková A; Do QD; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Mikeš O; Cihlář D; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Prázný M; Šoupal J
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2022 Dec; 24(12):859-867. PubMed ID: 36037056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Baseline User Characteristics on the Benefits of Real-Time Versus Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Moderator Analyses of the ALERTT1 Trial.
Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 May; 18(3):660-666. PubMed ID: 36172693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes in England.
Elliott RA; Rogers G; Evans ML; Neupane S; Rayman G; Lumley S; Cranston I; Narendran P; Sutton CJ; Taxiarchi VP; Burns M; Thabit H; Wilmot EG; Leelarathna L;
Diabet Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):e15232. PubMed ID: 37750427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hásková A; Radovnická L; Petruželková L; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Kádě O; Matoulek M; Prázný M; Šoupal J
Diabetes Care; 2020 Nov; 43(11):2744-2750. PubMed ID: 32859607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Real-world glycaemic outcomes in adult persons with type 1 diabetes using a real-time continuous glucose monitor compared to an intermittently scanned glucose monitor: A retrospective observational study from the Canadian LMC diabetes registry (REAL-CGM-T1D).
Brown RE; Chu L; Norman GJ; Abitbol A
Diabet Med; 2022 Nov; 39(11):e14937. PubMed ID: 36065977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Glycemic Metrics Measured Simultaneously by Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes.
Nørgaard SK; Mathiesen ER; Nørgaard K; Ringholm L
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2021 Oct; 23(10):665-672. PubMed ID: 34086494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes.
Avari P; Moscardo V; Jugnee N; Oliver N; Reddy M
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):567-574. PubMed ID: 31375042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
Heinemann L; Freckmann G; Ehrmann D; Faber-Heinemann G; Guerra S; Waldenmaier D; Hermanns N
Lancet; 2018 Apr; 391(10128):1367-1377. PubMed ID: 29459019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the glycaemic outcomes between real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) among adults and children with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhou Y; Sardana D; Kuroko S; Haszard JJ; de Block MI; Weng J; Jefferies C; Wheeler BJ
Diabet Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):e15280. PubMed ID: 38197238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-utility of real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in people with type 1 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections in Denmark.
Alshannaq H; Cogswell G; Pollock RF; Ahmed W; Norman GJ; Lynch PM; Roze S
Diabetes Obes Metab; 2023 Sep; 25(9):2704-2713. PubMed ID: 37334522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Switching from Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring with a Predictive Urgent Low Soon Alert Reduces Exposure to Hypoglycemia.
Preechasuk L; Avari P; Oliver N; Reddy M
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38315504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of factors associated with improved glycemic control after switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes.
Yamada E; Nakajima Y; Horiguchi K; Okada S; Yamada M
Endocr J; 2023 Dec; 70(12):1187-1193. PubMed ID: 37766568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term Cost-Effectiveness of Dexcom G6 Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes in the U.K.
Roze S; Isitt J; Smith-Palmer J; Javanbakht M; Lynch P
Diabetes Care; 2020 Oct; 43(10):2411-2417. PubMed ID: 32647050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of flash glucose monitoring with real time continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Massa GG; Gys I; Bevilacqua E; Wijnands A; Zeevaert R
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 152():111-118. PubMed ID: 31121275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Personalizing the Use of a Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device in Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes: A Cost-Effectiveness Perspective in the Netherlands (FLARE-NL 9).
Emamipour S; van Dijk PR; Bilo HJG; Edens MA; van der Galiën O; Postma MJ; Feenstra TL; van Boven JFM
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 Jan; 18(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 35815617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: A subgroup analysis from the FLASH-UK study.
Leelarathna L; Sutton CJ; Evans ML; Neupane S; Rayman G; Lumley S; Cranston I; Narendran P; Krishan A; Taxiarchi VP; Barnard-Kelly K; Elliott RA; Burns M; Camm M; Thabit H; Wilmot EG;
Diabet Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):e15249. PubMed ID: 37897112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
